Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 07, 2005 Re2d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Attachments: | I made a small adjustment to http://re2c.org/ re2c, a lexical analyser generator to not produce #line tags. The rest it generates is still compatible with D. |
April 08, 2005 Re: Re2d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joey Peters | Joey Peters wrote: > I made a small adjustment to http://re2c.org/ re2c, a lexical analyser generator to not produce #line tags. The rest it generates is still compatible with D. > > What version of RE2C: THe CVS one or the March 12, 2005 package ? Very recently some bugs have been corrected in the CVS. Did you removed line tags production, because you dont need them, or because they are imcompatible with D ? I think #line tags are compatible with D. those are called special tokens. C |
April 08, 2005 Re: Re2d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Carlos | The package one, not the CVS one, I don't have a CVS client, yet. No, I don't think #line s work. The whole #x functionality has been taken out and been elegantly put into new features, but I don't know about #line's replacement. "Carlos" <carlos2003nov@yahoo.ca> schreef in bericht news:d34vv7$1c9d$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Joey Peters wrote: >> I made a small adjustment to http://re2c.org/ re2c, a lexical analyser generator to not produce #line tags. The rest it generates is still compatible with D. > What version of RE2C: THe CVS one or > the March 12, 2005 package ? > > Very recently some bugs have been corrected > in the CVS. > > Did you removed line tags production, because you dont need them, or because they are imcompatible with D ? > > I think #line tags are compatible with D. > those are called special tokens. > > C |
April 08, 2005 Re: Re2d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joey Peters | Joey Peters wrote: > No, I don't think #line s work. The whole #x functionality has been taken out and been elegantly put into new features, but I don't know about #line's replacement. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html#specialtokenseq |
April 08, 2005 Re: Re2d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Carlos | Ok that's -really- weird, why did they choose to keep -that-? They could replace it with a pragma or something else more elegant. Hmmm... I stand corrected. "Carlos" <carlos2003nov@yahoo.ca> schreef in bericht news:d35put$2abk$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Joey Peters wrote: > >> No, I don't think #line s work. The whole #x functionality has been taken out and been elegantly put into new features, but I don't know about #line's replacement. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html#specialtokenseq |
November 25 Re: Re2d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joey Peters | On Thursday, 7 April 2005 at 20:06:46 UTC, Joey Peters wrote: > I made a small adjustment to http://re2c.org/ re2c, a lexical analyser generator to not produce #line tags. The rest it generates is still compatible with D. Now there's an official port: http://re2c.org/releases/release_notes.html#release-4-0 |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation