On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:20:52 -0500, Carlos Santander wrote:

> Stewart Gordon escribió:
>> Carlos Santander wrote:
>> <snip>
>> 
>>> I also asked Walter to move toMBSz (on 2004-06-30, "[request] toMBSz"), but he asked again "why move it?".
>> 
>> 
>> Because it's absurd to import std.file to get functionality that has nothing to do with files.
>> 
>> We should move useWfuncs, toMBSz and the associated initialisation into a module under std.windows.  And write fromMBSz while we're at it.
>> 
>> Stewart.
>> 
> 
> Convince him of that.

Of course they should be moved. They are string handling routines not file routines.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
27/08/2005 12:58:56 PM

Roald Ribe wrote:
<snip>
> This is a good point, often forgotten in the quest to support
> as many as possible. Users not upgrading their OS, are not likely
> to buy new software.

But I'm sure millions of such people download new software.

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K- w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.