Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 05, 2005 Why no stack trace in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I need stacktrace, maybe enable it in debug version? |
November 06, 2005 Re: Why no stack trace in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to cpunion | On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:11:20 +0000, cpunion wrote: > I need stacktrace, maybe enable it in debug version? Then go and vote for it on the wish list http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/ It is currently no. 6 most wanted feature see http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/story.php http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/index.php?it=53 should help explaining why it is not in d already |
November 13, 2005 Re: Why no stack trace in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Knud Sørensen | Knud Sørensen wrote: > On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:11:20 +0000, cpunion wrote: >>I need stacktrace, maybe enable it in debug version? > > Then go and vote for it on the wish list http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/ > > It is currently no. 6 most wanted feature see > http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/story.php > > http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/index.php?it=53 > should help explaining why it is not in d already As of just now (2005-11-12 22:35:00-08:00), I'm unable to get at the web site - Google has some cached information, but not all the information. Is the site still with us - I'm just seeing a glitch? -- Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com Guardian of DBD::Informix v2005.02 -- http://dbi.perl.org/ |
November 13, 2005 Re: Why no stack trace in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jonathan Leffler | On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:35:52 -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > Knud Sørensen wrote: >> On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:11:20 +0000, cpunion wrote: >>>I need stacktrace, maybe enable it in debug version? >> >> Then go and vote for it on the wish list http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/ >> >> It is currently no. 6 most wanted feature see http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/story.php >> >> >> http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/index.php?it=53 >> should help explaining why it is not in d already > > As of just now (2005-11-12 22:35:00-08:00), I'm unable to get at the web > site - Google has some cached information, but not all the information. > Is the site still with us - I'm just seeing a glitch? It's down. I've noticed that this site has a lot of downtime. Just wait a bit and I'm sure it'll return. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia 13/11/2005 5:46:12 PM |
November 18, 2005 Re: Why no stack trace in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Derek Parnell | Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:35:52 -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
>
>
>>Knud Sørensen wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:11:20 +0000, cpunion wrote:
>>>
>>>>I need stacktrace, maybe enable it in debug version?
>>>
>>>Then go and vote for it on the wish list http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/
>>>
>>>It is currently no. 6 most wanted feature see
>>>http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/story.php
>>>
>>>
>>>http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/index.php?it=53
>>>should help explaining why it is not in d already
>>
>>As of just now (2005-11-12 22:35:00-08:00), I'm unable to get at the web site - Google has some cached information, but not all the information.
>> Is the site still with us - I'm just seeing a glitch?
>
>
> It's down. I've noticed that this site has a lot of downtime. Just wait a
> bit and I'm sure it'll return.
Well, it's tooking it sweet time to return..
Still doesn't work, do anyone has saved the data?
Regards,
Renaud.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation