"Don Clugston" <dac@nospam.com.au> wrote in message news:dumpam$2e63$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> BTW, I reckon it's only a matter of time before 100% of spambots do
> " ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) at (([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) dot)+ (com|net|org)" regexp searches
> while looking for email addresses. I'm just amazed that people (including
> gcc compiler writers!) think that simple text replacement of @ and . will
> keep them safe.

That's why the news archives here use 'xx' instead of 'at' <g>.

Brad Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> 
>> The preferred way now to submit bugs is in the bugzilla, right Walter?
>> (and only in the bugzilla, since it takes care automatically of mirroring the
>> report on the .bugs NG, right?)
> 
> IMHO, bugzilla should be preferred over direct posting to the news group due to it's inherent trackability, yes.
> 
>> Also, out of curiosity, the NG reporting is a feature of bugzilla, or some
>> add-on? Could you point me to some doc/info about it, I couldn't find any.
> 
> I did some custom hacks to bugzilla to get it to post to the newsgroup.  It's on my low priority list to take the hacks and work them into a productizeable form.  I'm really too unhappy with how hacky the changes are right now to even hand out diffs.  I really want to make it more flexible and configurable than it is.  Right now it's very hardcoded, every bug, regardless of product, category, etc.. all get posted to digitalmars.D.bugs and only on the news.digitalmars.com server.  Unacceptable, really.
> 
> Later,
> Brad

It would be nice that in the posts made by the bugzilla system, the NG sender field had some info about the original poster, instead of "d-bugmail@puremagic.com". For instance, like "braddr@puremagic.com [BUGZILLA]" or some variation of that (possibly with the real name instead of email).

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D