D : "Modern, Powerful, and Sleek."

-------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Dare to reach for the Stars...Dare to Dream, Build, and Achieve!"
-------------------------------------------------------------------

 MKoD: http://spottedtiger.tripod.com/D_Language/D_Main_XP.html

> 4) D the fastest way to fast code.
Okey, many seams to like this.
Here is some variations.

a) D the fast way to fast code.
b) D the fastest way to fast code.
c) D the fast way to the fastest code.
d) D the fastest way to the fastest code.

I think I like a) best.

I all cases it does describe the fact that.

A D compiler is fast to implement.
D is high level so it is fast to develop programs.
D compiles really fast.
D make really fast code.
And D helps you debug you programs fast.

So, I think it is a very good catchphrase.

Knud

E = mD2

Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> E = m*D*^2

I'd be amazed if this didn't show up on Think Geek T-shirts.

Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> E = m*D*^2

So what is the implication here? Is D a larger constant than C? So we get more E for our m? I'm confused as to how this relates. (I am a physicist so sorry for the nit pick)

In article <dvr3n6$2u4$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter Bright says...
>
>If you could  sum up the essence of D in a "high concept", what would it be?
>
>http://www.themegahitmovies.com/highconcept.htm
>
>Some particularly bad ones:
>
>1) Write once, debug everywhere
>2) Tastes great, less filling.
>3) Choosy programmers choose D.
>4) C's dead, Jim.
>5) So sophisticated, even we don't understand it.
>6) Resistance is useless.
>
>Some marginally better ones:
>
>1) Power, Performance, Productivity
>
>

Here's one for the books:

(D)ynamite - explosive power in a portable package!

"Here comes the BOOM!!!"

Todd Shirk

How about:

:D The fun way to write fast code.
:D The funnest way to write fast code.

Tom J


In article <pan.2006.03.24.19.46.49.355998@sneakemail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?q?Knud_S=F8rensen?= says...
>
>
>> 4) D the fastest way to fast code.
>Okey, many seams to like this.
>Here is some variations.
>
>a) D the fast way to fast code.
>b) D the fastest way to fast code.
>c) D the fast way to the fastest code.
>d) D the fastest way to the fastest code.
>
>I think I like a) best.
>
>I all cases it does describe the fact that.
>
>A D compiler is fast to implement.
>D is high level so it is fast to develop programs.
>D compiles really fast.
>D make really fast code.
>And D helps you debug you programs fast.
>
>So, I think it is a very good catchphrase.
>
>Knud
>
>
>

"Kyle Furlong" <kylefurlong@gmail.com> wrote in message news:e01lqg$2ukp$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>> E = m*D*^2
>
> So what is the implication here? Is D a larger constant than C? So we get more E for our m? I'm confused as to how this relates. (I am a physicist so sorry for the nit pick)

OT: Well, I am a physicist too. (MS in Physics and Applied Mathematics if it interesting to someone)

The idea that D has speed of light (or even more :-).
And mutliplied by m, some good *m*an's effort if you wish, can produce a lot
of energy thus power.

Huh?

Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> E = m*D*^2

I vote on that. It's ingenius.

Regards,
Alex

+1 but, also: "Just D it!"


In article <e02r3c$1m3a$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Alexander Panek says...
>
>Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>> E = m*D*^2
>
>I vote on that. It's ingenius.
>
>Regards,
>Alex