July 30, 2006 Re: 'Build' utility must have a new name. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Derek | Derek wrote:
> According to some, the utility progam that I'm responsible for, currently called 'Build' has a poor choice as a name. So may I please ask the D community for nominations of a new name for the utility?
dbuild is perfectly fine
|
July 30, 2006 Re: 'Build' utility must have a new name. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Derek | On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:29:22 +1000, Derek wrote: > I have no investment in any specific name for the utility, so give me some ideas. I'll attempt to sort out a consensus for a new name but if I can't I'll just pick one anyhow. I've started a Wiki page on the utility's project site to collect ideas and 'votes'. http://www.dsource.org/projects/build/wiki/Build_Remaining -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia "Down with mediocrity!" |
July 30, 2006 Re: 'Build' utility must have a new name. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David L. Davis | David L. Davis wrote: > Here's a few more suggestions: > > dmdbuild - Digital Mars D Build(er) <snip> Can't it use GDC instead of DMD? To make it compatible with as many D compilers as possible would be a good course of action for the future, thereby warranting a compiler-neutral name. Stewart. -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit. |
July 30, 2006 Re: 'Build' utility must have a new name. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stewart Gordon | "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:eaiqns$1760$1@digitaldaemon.com... > David L. Davis wrote: >> Here's a few more suggestions: >> >> dmdbuild - Digital Mars D Build(er) > <snip> > > Can't it use GDC instead of DMD? To make it compatible with as many D compilers as possible would be a good course of action for the future, thereby warranting a compiler-neutral name. > > Stewart. > > -- > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- > Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit. Stewart, roger that...I agree with your point! That's why everyone, myself included are mainly looking at "dbuild" as the new name. dmdbuild - this suggestion is now changed to "dobuild", for D Object Build(er) - the name is a bit catchier! :) Also, forgive me for my lack of knowledge in this area (because I've only used WinXP and DMD), but what is the executable name of D with the GDC compiler, is it named something like gdc.exe? Thanks in advance for your reply, David L. ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Dare to reach for the Stars...Dare to Dream, Build, and Achieve!" ------------------------------------------------------------------- MKoD: http://spottedtiger.tripod.com/D_Language/D_Main_XP.html |
August 01, 2006 Re: 'Build' utility must have a new name. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David L. Davis | David L. Davis wrote: <snip> > Also, forgive me for my lack of knowledge in this area (because I've only used WinXP and DMD), but what is the executable name of D with the GDC compiler, is it named something like gdc.exe? <snip> In short, it's gdc. Whether it has the ".exe" on the end would depend on the platform. This is one that matches GCC's CLUI rather than DMD's. GDC also includes a wrapper, also called dmd, which provides a DMD-like CLUI for GDC. I've also somewhere seen gdmd, but I'm not sure of the difference. Stewart. -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit. |
August 07, 2006 Re: 'Build' utility must have a new name. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David L. Davis | David L. Davis wrote:
> Derek here's a few names that are mostly short:
>
> bud - Build Utility for D
> forgeD - (meaning: Make out of components)
> dccu - D Component Creator Utility
> dggu - D's Gather and Glue Utility
> dub - D's Utility to Build
> dfpd - D's focal-point builder
>
> and of course "dbuild" would work as well.
>
> David L.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Dare to reach for the Stars...Dare to Dream, Build, and Achieve!"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> MKoD: http://spottedtiger.tripod.com/D_Language/D_Main_XP.html
>
>
One (vote for) bud please!
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation