Peter C. Chapin skrev:
> Fredrik Olsson <peylow@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:ehn3fv$10m1$1@digitaldaemon.com: 
> 
>> So point is still; I think another name like "Mars D" that is more unique will prove more useful in the long run.
> 
> "Mars D" seems to tie the language to a single implementation. In the long run, that probably isn't ideal.
> 
I would not fear that "the D programming language" feels way more /single implementation/ to me than "Mars D".

In my ears it has a nice ring to it, pays homage to it's roots, let it's users continue to just say D, and is not already taken as a programming language name.

But hey, call it whatever, it is just a name. I just wanted to point out that "D programming language" may not be the best choice.


// Fredrik Olsson