Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 27, 2006 Minimalistic Phobos? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed. For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent? // Fredrik Olsson |
October 27, 2006 Re: Minimalistic Phobos? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Fredrik Olsson | Fredrik Olsson wrote:
> I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed.
>
> For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent?
>
>
> // Fredrik Olsson
You could take a look at Ares to get a good idea. The only ones I know for sure are module 'object' and package 'std.internal'. Giving the required runtime code its own 'core' package (or whatever name) isn't a bad idea.
-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
|
October 27, 2006 Re: Minimalistic Phobos? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Chris Nicholson-Sauls | Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> Fredrik Olsson wrote:
>> I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed.
>>
>> For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent?
>>
>>
>> // Fredrik Olsson
>
> You could take a look at Ares to get a good idea. The only ones I know for sure are module 'object' and package 'std.internal'. Giving the required runtime code its own 'core' package (or whatever name) isn't a bad idea.
A few other modules needed offhand:
std.thread
std.asserterror
std.cover (for -cov, not used by gdc)
std.moduleinit
std.outofmemory
std.switcherror
std.syserror
std/typeinfo/*
Aside from import dependencies by the code in internal, I think that about covers it. And you can stub out the thread code if you aren't targeting a multithreaded system.
Sean
|
October 27, 2006 Re: Minimalistic Phobos? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly | Sean Kelly wrote:
> Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
>> Fredrik Olsson wrote:
>>> I am looking into using D for an embedded system, for this GDC for ARM, and some tweaking of Phobos needed.
>>>
>>> For this I find most of the functionality in Phobos is kind of superfluous. So my question is, what are the bare minimum needed to get D up and running? And would it not be a good idea to move this from std.* to say core.* or equivalent?
>>>
>>>
>>> // Fredrik Olsson
>>
>> You could take a look at Ares to get a good idea. The only ones I know for sure are module 'object' and package 'std.internal'. Giving the required runtime code its own 'core' package (or whatever name) isn't a bad idea.
>
> A few other modules needed offhand:
>
> std.thread
> std.asserterror
> std.cover (for -cov, not used by gdc)
> std.moduleinit
> std.outofmemory
> std.switcherror
> std.syserror
Oops, I think syserror is for converting system errors to strings and is not an error handler itself. This one shouldn't be necessary after all.
Sean
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation