Hello!

I would like to define two kinds of static opCall() in class like below:

static Any opCall(T)(T t) {
        return (new Any()).assign(t);
}

static Any opCall() {
        return new Any();
}

It seems for me properly coded (overloading should work as there is quite a big difference between function taking no parameters and function taking one parameter), but compiler complains:

..... : function Any.opCall conflicts with Any.opCall(T) at .....


Is it a compiler bug? Or maybe there is some workaround?

-- 
Regards
Marcin Kuszczak
(Aarti_pl)

Marcin Kuszczak wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I would like to define two kinds of static opCall() in class like below:
> 
> static Any opCall(T)(T t) {
>         return (new Any()).assign(t);
> }
> 
> static Any opCall() {
>         return new Any();
> }
> 
> It seems for me properly coded (overloading should work as there is quite a
> big difference between function taking no parameters and function taking
> one parameter), but compiler complains:
> 
> ..... : function Any.opCall conflicts with Any.opCall(T) at .....
> 
> 
> Is it a compiler bug? Or maybe there is some workaround?
> 

I don't think its a bug, per se, but an effect of attempting to overload a function template with an ordinary function.  Try providing a dummy specialization of the template instead, such as:

# static Any opCall (T) (T t) {
#   return (new Any).assign(t);
# }
#
# static Any opCall () () {
#   return new Any;
# }

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls