Thread overview
Compiling nedmalloc
Jan 05, 2007
Craig Black
Jan 05, 2007
Craig Black
Jan 07, 2007
Paul McKenzie
January 05, 2007
I've been talking with Niall Douglas, the author of nedmalloc about my problems with compiling it using DMC.  He says the libraries are outdated. In addition to the problem posted below, it seems that DMC's kernel32.lib does not include the required functions TryEnterCriticalSection and Initialize CriticalSectionAndSpinCount.

On 5 Jan 2007 at 11:33, Craig Black wrote:

> Sorry I didn't respond sooner. Someone told me that it didn't compile
under
> DMC, so to verify I had to find the time to try it myself. nedmalloc.c
does
> compile, but test.c does not. It could be a problem with the Digital Mars
C
> compiler. Perhaps if we can figure out what the bug is, we can report it.
Or
> maybe there is a quick fix that you could implement to get it working. Here's the error messages I get.
>
> C:\nedmalloc>..\dm\bin\dmc test.c -w -c
> HeapSetInformation(win32heap, HeapCompatibilityInformation,
> &data, sizeof(data));
> ^
> test.c(228) : Error: undefined identifier 'HeapCompatibilityInformation'
> --- errorlevel 1
>
> Thanks in advance.

Heh, that's dirt easy! Your friend is using an old SDK which isn't defining HeapCompatibilityInformation. He can upgrade it, or else substitute 0 for it. See http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en- us/library/aa366705.aspx.

Cheers,

Niall


January 05, 2007
> In addition to the problem posted below, it seems that DMC's kernel32.lib does not include the required functions TryEnterCriticalSection and InitializeCriticalSectionAndSpinCount.

After talking with Niall some more, we found that we could get rid of the TryEnterCriticalSection link error by adding the line

#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x403

before

#include <windows.h>

Curiosly, this did not fix the link error with InitializeCriticalSectionAndSpinCount.  After further investigation, I found that both are found in DMC's kernel32.lib.  Perhaps the function parameters are different.  I still think DMC may need to upgrade it's libraries.

Anyone have any other ideas?

-Craig



January 07, 2007
"Craig Black" <cblack@ara.com> wrote in message news:enm7q2$2ub2$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Anyone have any other ideas?
>
> -Craig

Why not just use the implib.exe found in the installation BIN directory? Then you can just create the library from the DLL if the library is not up-to-date.

Paul