"Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message news:4573DD25.1010903@gentech.co.il...
> If you want my silly little DirectShow app, I can send/post that, thoug I guess most COM users would have different uses than DirectShow.

Sure, that'd be a good idea. I can maybe make some changes, and that'll be a more concentrated mechanism for knowledge transfer. (And identify to me where I'm failing in the documentation.)

Cheers

Matthew

Hi Mathew,

  My code is taken from here
<http://www.site.uottawa.ca/%7Elaganier/tutorial/opencv+directshow/cvision.htm>:
<http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~laganier/tutorial/opencv+directshow/cvision.htm>.
I started from Check point #2 and worked by manually changing and
refactoring the code from there.
(You don't really need OpenCV for this project, just remove any
references to it and you should be fine).

Adi


Matthew wrote:
> "Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message
> news:4573DD25.1010903@gentech.co.il...
> 
>> If you want my silly little DirectShow app, I can send/post that, thoug
>> I guess most COM users would have different uses than DirectShow.
>> 
>
> Sure, that'd be a good idea. I can maybe make some changes, and that'll be a more concentrated mechanism for knowledge transfer. (And identify to me where I'm failing in the documentation.)
>
> Cheers
>
> Matthew
>
>
> 

How did you go with your COM travels?

Any final requests for 1.9.1?
  "Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message news:4575C56C.5010200@gentech.co.il...
  Hi Mathew,

    My code is taken from here: <http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~laganier/tutorial/opencv+directshow/cvision.htm>.
  I started from Check point #2 and worked by manually changing and refactoring the code from there.
  (You don't really need OpenCV for this project, just remove any references to it and you should be fine).

  Adi


  Matthew wrote:
"Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message
news:4573DD25.1010903@gentech.co.il...
  If you want my silly little DirectShow app, I can send/post that, thoug
I guess most COM users would have different uses than DirectShow.

Sure, that'd be a good idea. I can maybe make some changes, and that'll be a
more concentrated mechanism for knowledge transfer. (And identify to me
where I'm failing in the documentation.)

Cheers

Matthew

> How did you go with your COM travels?
Well, I actually got stuck with that one, though I'll probably come back to it sometime soon.

However, I did use the same mechanisms in another little project I did,
about which I'll post a short article on CodeProject soon.
It saved me all the COM hassle and made for a beautiful little Extended
STL project :-).
I'll probably post it in about 2 weeks, as I'm off to a vacation tomorrow.
I'll post the link here when its up on CodeProject. I think you'll like it.
> Any final requests for 1.9.1?
None at the moment.
When I last used it it did every thing I wanted, needed and more*.

Adi

** 'more' *means that after I wrote my class that contains a COM resource I needed to use it in another API that needed it to be copy-constructible, something I hadn't notice before. Naturally, the automatic ref-counting allowed that without any changes so I was home free, and everything worked as planned.

Good to hear to all of the above (er, below).

Looking forward to seeing your article.

Have a nice holiday. :-)
  "Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message news:er7mbv$192d$1@digitalmars.com...


    How did you go with your COM travels?
  Well, I actually got stuck with that one, though I'll probably come back to it sometime soon.

  However, I did use the same mechanisms in another little project I did, about which I'll post a short article on CodeProject soon.
  It saved me all the COM hassle and made for a beautiful little Extended STL project :-).
  I'll probably post it in about 2 weeks, as I'm off to a vacation tomorrow.
  I'll post the link here when its up on CodeProject. I think you'll like it.

    Any final requests for 1.9.1?
  None at the moment.
  When I last used it it did every thing I wanted, needed and more*.

  Adi

  * 'more' means that after I wrote my class that contains a COM resource I needed to use it in another API that needed it to be copy-constructible, something I hadn't notice before. Naturally, the automatic ref-counting allowed that without any changes so I was home free, and everything worked as planned.

Hi,


 My article was just posted, you can read it here *audio_ostream - A Text-to-Speech ostream* <http://www.codeproject.com/audio/audio_ostream.asp>.


Enjoy,

Adi


P.S.

There seems to be some problem with the files, which I'll sort out with the site, but the meat is in the article anyway.

**



Adi Shavit wrote:

>> How did you go with your COM travels?
> Well, I actually got stuck with that one, though I'll probably come back to it sometime soon.
>
> However, I did use the same mechanisms in another little project I did, about which I'll post a short article on CodeProject soon.
> It saved me all the COM hassle and made for a beautiful little Extended STL project :-).
> I'll probably post it in about 2 weeks, as I'm off to a vacation tomorrow.
> I'll post the link here when its up on CodeProject. I think you'll like it.
>> Any final requests for 1.9.1?
> None at the moment.
> When I last used it it did every thing I wanted, needed and more*.
>
> Adi
>
> ** 'more' *means that after I wrote my class that contains a COM resource I needed to use it in another API that needed it to be copy-constructible, something I hadn't notice before. Naturally, the automatic ref-counting allowed that without any changes so I was home free, and everything worked as planned.
>

Cool!

I might use this in a little tool I fancy building.

Cheers

Matthew

"Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message news:eslobt$11hj$1@digitalmars.com...
> Hi,
>
>
>   My article was just posted, you can read it here *audio_ostream - A
> Text-to-Speech ostream*
> <http://www.codeproject.com/audio/audio_ostream.asp>.
>
>
> Enjoy,
>
> Adi
>
>
> P.S.
>
> There seems to be some problem with the files, which I'll sort out with the site, but the meat is in the article anyway.
>
> **
>
>
>
> Adi Shavit wrote:
>
> >> How did you go with your COM travels?
> > Well, I actually got stuck with that one, though I'll probably come back to it sometime soon.
> >
> > However, I did use the same mechanisms in another little project I
> > did, about which I'll post a short article on CodeProject soon.
> > It saved me all the COM hassle and made for a beautiful little
> > Extended STL project :-).
> > I'll probably post it in about 2 weeks, as I'm off to a vacation
tomorrow.
> > I'll post the link here when its up on CodeProject. I think you'll like it.
> >> Any final requests for 1.9.1?
> > None at the moment.
> > When I last used it it did every thing I wanted, needed and more*.
> >
> > Adi
> >
> > ** 'more' *means that after I wrote my class that contains a COM resource I needed to use it in another API that needed it to be copy-constructible, something I hadn't notice before. Naturally, the automatic ref-counting allowed that without any changes so I was home free, and everything worked as planned.
> >

btw, you should probably stipulate that you need "STLSoft version 1.9.1 beta 44, or later".

I've had a lot of downloads of 1.8.9 in the last 24 hours, and I fear they may have been disappointed readers of your article. ;-/

Cheers

Matthew

"Matthew Wilson" <matthew@hat.stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:esn8uh$j06$3@digitalmars.com...
> Cool!
>
> I might use this in a little tool I fancy building.
>
> Cheers
>
> Matthew
>
> "Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message news:eslobt$11hj$1@digitalmars.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >   My article was just posted, you can read it here *audio_ostream - A
> > Text-to-Speech ostream*
> > <http://www.codeproject.com/audio/audio_ostream.asp>.
> >
> >
> > Enjoy,
> >
> > Adi
> >
> >
> > P.S.
> >
> > There seems to be some problem with the files, which I'll sort out with the site, but the meat is in the article anyway.
> >
> > **
> >
> >
> >
> > Adi Shavit wrote:
> >
> > >> How did you go with your COM travels?
> > > Well, I actually got stuck with that one, though I'll probably come back to it sometime soon.
> > >
> > > However, I did use the same mechanisms in another little project I
> > > did, about which I'll post a short article on CodeProject soon.
> > > It saved me all the COM hassle and made for a beautiful little
> > > Extended STL project :-).
> > > I'll probably post it in about 2 weeks, as I'm off to a vacation
> tomorrow.
> > > I'll post the link here when its up on CodeProject. I think you'll like it.
> > >> Any final requests for 1.9.1?
> > > None at the moment.
> > > When I last used it it did every thing I wanted, needed and more*.
> > >
> > > Adi
> > >
> > > ** 'more' *means that after I wrote my class that contains a COM resource I needed to use it in another API that needed it to be copy-constructible, something I hadn't notice before. Naturally, the automatic ref-counting allowed that without any changes so I was home free, and everything worked as planned.
> > >
>
>

Ah! Thanks.

Adi


Matthew Wilson wrote:

> btw, you should probably stipulate that you need "STLSoft version 1.9.1 beta
> 44, or later".
>
> I've had a lot of downloads of 1.8.9 in the last 24 hours, and I fear they
> may have been disappointed readers of your article. ;-/
>
> Cheers
>
> Matthew
>
> "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@hat.stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
> news:esn8uh$j06$3@digitalmars.com...
>   
>> Cool!
>>
>> I might use this in a little tool I fancy building.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> "Adi Shavit" <adish@gentech.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eslobt$11hj$1@digitalmars.com...
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>   My article was just posted, you can read it here *audio_ostream - A
>>> Text-to-Speech ostream*
>>> <http://www.codeproject.com/audio/audio_ostream.asp>.
>>>
>>>
>>> Enjoy,
>>>
>>> Adi
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S.
>>>
>>> There seems to be some problem with the files, which I'll sort out with
>>> the site, but the meat is in the article anyway.
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Adi Shavit wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>>> How did you go with your COM travels?
>>>>>           
>>>> Well, I actually got stuck with that one, though I'll probably come
>>>> back to it sometime soon.
>>>>
>>>> However, I did use the same mechanisms in another little project I
>>>> did, about which I'll post a short article on CodeProject soon.
>>>> It saved me all the COM hassle and made for a beautiful little
>>>> Extended STL project :-).
>>>> I'll probably post it in about 2 weeks, as I'm off to a vacation
>>>>         
>> tomorrow.
>>     
>>>> I'll post the link here when its up on CodeProject. I think you'll
>>>> like it.
>>>>         
>>>>> Any final requests for 1.9.1?
>>>>>           
>>>> None at the moment.
>>>> When I last used it it did every thing I wanted, needed and more*.
>>>>
>>>> Adi
>>>>
>>>> ** 'more' *means that after I wrote my class that contains a COM
>>>> resource I needed to use it in another API that needed it to be
>>>> copy-constructible, something I hadn't notice before. Naturally, the
>>>> automatic ref-counting allowed that without any changes so I was home
>>>> free, and everything worked as planned.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>     
>
>
>   

PS,

I'm glad you liked it.

Adi