0ffh wrote:
> Pragma wrote:
>> 0ffh wrote:
>>> Well, I suppose that is the danger of pure text communication, dropping all the secondary comm channels: A blink, a quick smile, whatever...
>> ;)
>> :)
> 
> O RLY?
> Still: Those may be plain forgotten, as you have to will them explicitly.
> And even as they improve the situation, they're still not the real thing.
> 
> Regards, Frank

Maybe instead of all this Flash and Silverlight and other pointless "lock yourself into OUR platform!  We'll give you candy!" crap, maybe we should invent EML: Emotional Markup Language.

<emotion class="hopeful">I mean, just <emphatic style="hand-motion-style: exaggerated;">think</emphatic> how much <div style="hand-motion: wave; hand-selector: both;">clearer</div> communication would be if we had it<div style="exclamation-style: !emphatic-not-angry;">!</div></emotion>

Also, we need a standard meaning for smilies.  I can just see the RFC now...

InlineEmotionalUnit := "^" "o" ")"

  This sequence of  characters SHALL denote or  convey a feeling
  of confusion regarding the previously expressed emotional unit
  OR previously  conveyed message.  It SHALL ALSO  indicate that
  the person or persons transmitting  this unit are not entirely
  surprised by the content they are responding to.

  This may colloquially be  referred to as the "Spock" smilie or
  "Dry ORLY?" smilie.

  See section 3.4 paragraphs 9 through 12.

	-- Daniel

-- 
int getRandomNumber()
{
    return 4; // chosen by fair dice roll.
              // guaranteed to be random.
}

http://xkcd.com/

v2sw5+8Yhw5ln4+5pr6OFPma8u6+7Lw4Tm6+7l6+7D i28a2Xs3MSr2e4/6+7t4TNSMb6HTOp5en5g6RAHCP  http://hackerkey.com/

Anders Bergh wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Nicolai Waniek <no.spam@thank.you> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Nette Idee! Mal sehen, ob sich sowas an der uulm auch Umsetzen lässt.
>>
>>
>> Grüße
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please post to this list in English, because not everyone here understands German.
> 

Sorry, I thought German suited this time ;)

Best regards,
Nicolai

Manfred Nowak wrote:
> Nicolai Waniek wrote
> 
>> ob sich sowas an der uulm auch Umsetzen lässt.
> 
> As it seems there is no chair for programming languages or for compilers at the university of ulm. Therefore the chance is close to zero, that at the university of ulm a seminar on D programming will take place in the near future.
> 
> -manfred
> 

Well there is a faculty for compilers and programming methodics, so I'll have a talk to those guys. :-)


Best regards,
Nicolai

0ffh wrote:
> Pragma wrote:
>> 0ffh wrote:
>>> Well, I suppose that is the danger of pure text communication, dropping
>>> all the secondary comm channels: A blink, a quick smile, whatever...
>> ;)
>> :)
> 
> O RLY?

QUITE RLY! And one can't do image macros on face to face communication. Score +1 for teh intarweb. :D


-- 
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D