Don Clugston wrote:
> 
> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the changelog. <g>

Delimited string literals?


Sean

Don Clugston wrote:
> 1.020 seemed to be stable. Like 1.016, it was around for a long time, and therefore particularly well tested. There were some great bug fixes in 1.018 and 1.019.

Done.

> There's that substantive change about .init which happened in 1.017. If that's permanent, it'd be good to stop further development relying on the old behaviour.
> I think we need a policy for when the 'stable version' should be updated.
> 
> 
> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the changelog. <g>

Fixed.

Reply to Walter,

> Don Clugston wrote:
> 
>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>> changelog. <g>
>> 
> Fixed.
> 

where's the docs?

BCS wrote:
> Reply to Walter,
> 
>> Don Clugston wrote:
>>
>>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>>> changelog. <g>
>>>
>> Fixed.
>>
> 
> where's the docs?
> 
> 

The docs for delimited string literals are now at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html

Thanks,
Nathan Reed

Reply to Benjamin,

> Reply to Walter,
> 
>> Don Clugston wrote:
>> 
>>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>>> changelog. <g>
>>> 
>> Fixed.
>> 
> where's the docs?
> 

OK I see DelimitedString and TokenString in the BNF but the doc seem to be a bit mangled about naming things (2 type in the BNF and 3 down below?)

Nathan Reed wrote:
> BCS wrote:
>> Reply to Walter,
>>
>>> Don Clugston wrote:
>>>
>>>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>>>> changelog. <g>
>>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>>
>>
>> where's the docs?
>>
>>
> 
> The docs for delimited string literals are now at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html

And the lecture slides have more info, obviously.


Sean

Reply to Sean,

> Nathan Reed wrote:
> 
>> BCS wrote:
>> 
>>> Reply to Walter,
>>> 
>>>> Don Clugston wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>>>>> changelog. <g>
>>>>> 
>>>> Fixed.
>>>> 
>>> where's the docs?
>>> 
>> The docs for delimited string literals are now at
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html
>> 
> And the lecture slides have more info, obviously.
> 
> Sean
> 


I wish Walter would put more links from the change log into the docs (and more labels in the docs)

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Nathan Reed wrote:
>> BCS wrote:
>>> Reply to Walter,
>>>
>>>> Don Clugston wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>>>>> changelog. <g>
>>>>>
>>>> Fixed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> where's the docs?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The docs for delimited string literals are now at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html
> 
> And the lecture slides have more info, obviously.

Actually, the docs on the web go into a bunch more detail than the lecture slides :)

Thanks,
Nathan Reed

BCS wrote:
> Reply to Benjamin,
> 
>> Reply to Walter,
>>
>>> Don Clugston wrote:
>>>
>>>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>>>> changelog. <g>
>>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>>
>> where's the docs?
>>
> 
> OK I see DelimitedString and TokenString in the BNF but the doc seem to be a bit mangled about naming things (2 type in the BNF and 3 down below?)

What are you referring to?  There are two doc sections, "Delimited Strings" and "Token Strings".

Thanks,
Nathan Reed

Reply to Nathan,

> BCS wrote:
> 
>> Reply to Benjamin,
>> 
>>> Reply to Walter,
>>> 
>>>> Don Clugston wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Also, I don't see any mention of delimited string literals in the
>>>>> changelog. <g>
>>>>> 
>>>> Fixed.
>>>> 
>>> where's the docs?
>>> 
>> OK I see DelimitedString and TokenString in the BNF but the doc seem
>> to be a bit mangled about naming things (2 type in the BNF and 3 down
>> below?)
>> 
> What are you referring to?  There are two doc sections, "Delimited
> Strings" and "Token Strings".
> 
> Thanks,
> Nathan Reed

oops I read the table heading "Nesting Delimiters" as a section heading

and I guess heredoc and delimited are the same thing.