CCBI is the Conforming Concurrent Befunge Interpreter, written in D with Tango. It's the only Befunge-98 interpreter out there which conforms to the specifications, and it implements almost every fingerprint I'm aware of.

http://www.iki.fi/deewiant/#ccbi

It's got a narrow target audience, I know <g>. Feel free to play with it if you're thusly inclined.

If you don't know what Befunge is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Befunge http://www.esolangs.org/wiki/Befunge

-- 
E-mail address: matti.niemenmaa+news, domain is iki (DOT) fi

Matti Niemenmaa wrote:
> CCBI is the Conforming Concurrent Befunge Interpreter, written in D with Tango.
> It's the only Befunge-98 interpreter out there which conforms to the
> specifications, and it implements almost every fingerprint I'm aware of.
> 
> http://www.iki.fi/deewiant/#ccbi
> 
> It's got a narrow target audience, I know <g>. Feel free to play with it if
> you're thusly inclined.
> 
> If you don't know what Befunge is:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Befunge
> http://www.esolangs.org/wiki/Befunge
> 

You need to put a link to your compiler on the wikipedia page!

Walter Bright wrote:
> Matti Niemenmaa wrote:
>> CCBI is the Conforming Concurrent Befunge Interpreter, written in D with Tango.
>> It's the only Befunge-98 interpreter out there which conforms to the
>> specifications, and it implements almost every fingerprint I'm aware of.
>>
>> http://www.iki.fi/deewiant/#ccbi
>>
>> It's got a narrow target audience, I know <g>. Feel free to play with it if
>> you're thusly inclined.
>>
>> If you don't know what Befunge is:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Befunge
>> http://www.esolangs.org/wiki/Befunge
>>
> 
> You need to put a link to your compiler on the wikipedia page!

Eh, that seems like stepping over the line between "relevant information" and "blatant advertisement"

 - Gregor Richards

PS: Because I /never/ blatantly advertise!

PPS: Look for my name on esolangs.org ;)

Gregor Richards wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> You need to put a link to your compiler on the wikipedia page!
> 
> Eh, that seems like stepping over the line between "relevant information" and "blatant advertisement"

I don't think it steps over the line. Listing an implementation of a language is perfectly relevant. Annotating the listing with "Greatest EVER! Toot! Toot!" would be over the line.

Walter Bright wrote:
> Gregor Richards wrote:
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>> You need to put a link to your compiler on the wikipedia page!
>>
>> Eh, that seems like stepping over the line between "relevant information" and "blatant advertisement"
> 
> I don't think it steps over the line. Listing an implementation of a language is perfectly relevant. Annotating the listing with "Greatest EVER! Toot! Toot!" would be over the line.

Especially if its a link to the *only* conforming Befunge interpreter in existence, as Matti claims.

--bb

Walter Bright wrote:
> You need to put a link to your compiler on the wikipedia page!

Looks like somebody beat me to it. :-)

It might be better that way, doesn't look like shameless self-promotion.

-- 
E-mail address: matti.niemenmaa+news, domain is iki (DOT) fi