October 27, 2007 Re: Mmrnmhrm 0.2.1 released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to torhu | torhu wrote:
> torhu wrote:
>> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>> torhu wrote:
>>>> Mmrnmhrm doesn't show up in eclipse for me. I've got descent working. I've tried both using an external extension location, and just copying the files into the plugins dir. But no mention of Mmrnmhrm in the Platform Configuration dialog. I've followed the installation instructions on dsource. Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Are you sure you got all the deps right? Such as Eclipse 3.3 or superior, Java VM 1.5 or superior, and DLTK 0.9 (but no 1.0).
>>> If the problem persists, post the configuration log in Help, About Eclipse SDK, Configuration Details. Also post the Error log, in case there is anything there.
>>>
>> I think I've got the deps right. I've got the CDT download, so I don't have the JDT. But I guess that's not needed? I'll try reinstalling eclipse and the plugins, maybe that'll help.
>
> I tried reinstalling everything, but still no luck. I've attached the config and error logs from eclipse. I had to zip up the logs to avoid the news server's attachment size limit.
Nevermind, I know what's the problem now. I tried the eclipse java download instead of the C/C++ download, and then it worked. So it seems mhrmrmsrsdhfshdfwhatever needs the JDT, or something else that the CDT-only download is missing.
|
October 27, 2007 Re: Mmrnmhrm 0.2.1 released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to torhu | torhu wrote: > torhu wrote: >> torhu wrote: >>> Bruno Medeiros wrote: >>>> torhu wrote: >>>>> Mmrnmhrm doesn't show up in eclipse for me. I've got descent working. I've tried both using an external extension location, and just copying the files into the plugins dir. But no mention of Mmrnmhrm in the Platform Configuration dialog. I've followed the installation instructions on dsource. Any ideas? >>>> >>>> Are you sure you got all the deps right? Such as Eclipse 3.3 or superior, Java VM 1.5 or superior, and DLTK 0.9 (but no 1.0). >>>> If the problem persists, post the configuration log in Help, About Eclipse SDK, Configuration Details. Also post the Error log, in case there is anything there. >>>> >>> I think I've got the deps right. I've got the CDT download, so I don't have the JDT. But I guess that's not needed? I'll try reinstalling eclipse and the plugins, maybe that'll help. >> >> I tried reinstalling everything, but still no luck. I've attached the config and error logs from eclipse. I had to zip up the logs to avoid the news server's attachment size limit. > > Nevermind, I know what's the problem now. I tried the eclipse java download instead of the C/C++ download, and then it worked. So it seems mhrmrmsrsdhfshdfwhatever needs the JDT, or something else that the CDT-only download is missing. That was not supposed to happen, but I checked the code and you're right, there's a rogue dependency on the org.junit and org.junit4 plugins (which only come with JDT). That will be fixed on the next release. -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D |
October 27, 2007 Re: Mmrnmhrm 0.2.1 released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> torhu wrote:
>> torhu wrote:
>>> torhu wrote:
>>>> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>>>> torhu wrote:
>>>>>> Mmrnmhrm doesn't show up in eclipse for me. I've got descent working. I've tried both using an external extension location, and just copying the files into the plugins dir. But no mention of Mmrnmhrm in the Platform Configuration dialog. I've followed the installation instructions on dsource. Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure you got all the deps right? Such as Eclipse 3.3 or superior, Java VM 1.5 or superior, and DLTK 0.9 (but no 1.0).
>>>>> If the problem persists, post the configuration log in Help, About Eclipse SDK, Configuration Details. Also post the Error log, in case there is anything there.
>>>>>
>>>> I think I've got the deps right. I've got the CDT download, so I don't have the JDT. But I guess that's not needed? I'll try reinstalling eclipse and the plugins, maybe that'll help.
>>>
>>> I tried reinstalling everything, but still no luck. I've attached the config and error logs from eclipse. I had to zip up the logs to avoid the news server's attachment size limit.
>>
>> Nevermind, I know what's the problem now. I tried the eclipse java download instead of the C/C++ download, and then it worked. So it seems mhrmrmsrsdhfshdfwhatever needs the JDT, or something else that the CDT-only download is missing.
>
> That was not supposed to happen, but I checked the code and you're right, there's a rogue dependency on the org.junit and org.junit4 plugins (which only come with JDT). That will be fixed on the next release.
>
Cool, problem fixed! Btw, I think Descent's syntax highlighting colors look much nicer than Mmrnmhrm's.
|
November 03, 2007 Re: Mmrnmhrm 0.2.1 released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to torhu | torhu wrote: > Cool, problem fixed! Btw, I think Descent's syntax highlighting colors look much nicer than Mmrnmhrm's. Possibly. I'm still not sure which options would be best (even if just as a default, since it's configurable). For one hand, I'd like something similar to JDT, like Descent has, but I would also like that keywords have a blue coloring. I'm open to suggestions in this regard. -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D |
November 03, 2007 Re: Mmrnmhrm 0.2.1 released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> torhu wrote:
>> Cool, problem fixed! Btw, I think Descent's syntax highlighting colors look much nicer than Mmrnmhrm's.
>
> Possibly. I'm still not sure which options would be best (even if just as a default, since it's configurable). For one hand, I'd like something similar to JDT, like Descent has, but I would also like that keywords have a blue coloring. I'm open to suggestions in this regard.
>
>
I think it's mostly that having three different colors for keywords is bit too much that bothers me. I don't mind the blue color, although something like rgb(10, 36, 106) is a bit less heavy (notepad2's C++ keyword color).
But I think the defaults matter, the hideous default colors used by codeblocks really puts me off trying to use it. ;)
|
November 04, 2007 Re: Mmrnmhrm 0.2.1 released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to torhu | torhu wrote: > Bruno Medeiros wrote: >> torhu wrote: >>> Cool, problem fixed! Btw, I think Descent's syntax highlighting colors look much nicer than Mmrnmhrm's. >> >> Possibly. I'm still not sure which options would be best (even if just as a default, since it's configurable). For one hand, I'd like something similar to JDT, like Descent has, but I would also like that keywords have a blue coloring. I'm open to suggestions in this regard. >> >> > I think it's mostly that having three different colors for keywords is bit too much that bothers me. I don't mind the blue color, although something like rgb(10, 36, 106) is a bit less heavy (notepad2's C++ keyword color). > > But I think the defaults matter, the hideous default colors used by codeblocks really puts me off trying to use it. ;) 3 colors for keywords? Well, that's because I wanted to have a coloring closer to semantics than syntax, so that's why there are different categories for pure keywords, native types, and literal keywords (like 'true'). You can set them all to the same if you like. But I agree that the defaults need some refinement, especially with regards to the literals category. -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation