February 14, 2014 Re: D: pay for what you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Martin Nowak | On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 19:03:14 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> It already is, though it might not be fully implemented yet.
> Try 'dmd -betterC'.
So you mean the latest DMD release already has it?
|
February 14, 2014 Re: D: pay for what you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rel | On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 16:07:21 UTC, Rel wrote:
> So you mean the latest DMD release already has it?
It has been there for ages, undocumented - Walter was using to simplify porting dmd to new platforms. It only removes ModuleInfo though AFAIR.
|
February 14, 2014 Re: D: pay for what you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Paulo Pinto Attachments:
| On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Paulo Pinto <pjmlp@progtools.org> wrote:
> I agree, I rather pay a little more like in Modula-2 and Ada, than have what C++ has become.
>
>
You shouldn't really need to. Take a look at Rust for instance.
|
February 15, 2014 Re: D: pay for what you use? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ziad Hatahet | On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 21:35:23 UTC, Ziad Hatahet wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Paulo Pinto <pjmlp@progtools.org> wrote:
>
>> I agree, I rather pay a little more like in Modula-2 and Ada, than have
>> what C++ has become.
>>
>>
> You shouldn't really need to. Take a look at Rust for instance.
Rust has its own costs as compared to C++. There is no free lunch.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation