Am Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:14:54 +0100
schrieb "Gary Willoughby" <dev@nomad.so>:

> I'm not taking the chance and currently using:
> 
> x = (int[string]).init;

x = null; is shorter. Just saying ;)

-- 
Marco

On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 15:50:05 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> Am Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:14:54 +0100
> schrieb "Gary Willoughby" <dev@nomad.so>:
>
>> I'm not taking the chance and currently using:
>> 
>> x = (int[string]).init;
>
> x = null; is shorter. Just saying ;)

Does that actually work? I thought you had to assign at least some value. I'm gonna test this.

On Friday, 8 November 2013 at 09:04:28 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
> Does that actually work? I thought you had to assign at least some value. I'm gonna test this.

For D arrays and AA's .init, null and [] are pretty much the same thing.