torhu wrote:
> IIRC, it was released Jan 1.

Thanks, I'll fix (broke because I was reformatting the stuff).

Sean Kelly wrote:
> But this seems like a silly workaround for something that should work
> automatically.

You're right. I'll make it work.

Walter Bright wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
>> But this seems like a silly workaround for something that should work automatically.
> 
> You're right. I'll make it work.

Thanks a bunch.


Sean

Walter Bright wrote:

> bug fixing
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.026.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.010.zip

Walter,

What version of libstdc++ are you using now? The last time I tried using dmd on fedora core 5 it wouldn't work because dmd required libstdc++6.so and I only had libstdc++7.so and later.

Robert Jones wrote:
> What version of libstdc++ are you using now? The last time I tried using dmd
> on fedora core 5 it wouldn't work because dmd required libstdc++6.so and I
> only had libstdc++7.so and later.

I've been using 5 because many complained they couldn't get 6 for their systems.

Walter Bright wrote:
> Robert Jones wrote:
>> What version of libstdc++ are you using now? The last time I tried
>> using dmd
>> on fedora core 5 it wouldn't work because dmd required libstdc++6.so
>> and I
>> only had libstdc++7.so and later.
> 
> I've been using 5 because many complained they couldn't get 6 for their systems.

It's generally pretty easy to get older versions of a library, but not always easy to get newer ones.  The glibc change not too long ago ended up inspiring me to upgrade my Ubuntu install from 5.10 because I didn't have the proper version of the lib and the upgrade features for the OS had broken.


Sean

Sean Kelly wrote:

> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Robert Jones wrote:
>>> What version of libstdc++ are you using now? The last time I tried
>>> using dmd
>>> on fedora core 5 it wouldn't work because dmd required libstdc++6.so
>>> and I
>>> only had libstdc++7.so and later.
>> 
>> I've been using 5 because many complained they couldn't get 6 for their systems.
> 
> It's generally pretty easy to get older versions of a library, but not always easy to get newer ones.  The glibc change not too long ago ended up inspiring me to upgrade my Ubuntu install from 5.10 because I didn't have the proper version of the lib and the upgrade features for the OS had broken.
> 
> 
> Sean

Well, I'm just a regular user on my dad's machine. I can only install to /home/bob/bin so unless someone can point me to where I can get libstdc++5.so and maybe libstdc++6.so, I'm kinda screwed.

By any chance, are the D conference (at Amazon ) videos going to be published online.

Adil schrieb:
> By any chance, are the D conference (at Amazon ) videos going to be published online.

lol

Frank Benoit wrote:
> Adil schrieb:
>> By any chance, are the D conference (at Amazon ) videos going to be published online.
> 
> lol

I'm putting my money on Duke Nukem Forever.

--bb