Is it possible to check how many known bugs are still unsolved for D1 ?

Walter Bright wrote:
> A whole lotta library improvements.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.027.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.011.zip
> 
> I had planned on doing struct destructors for this update, but they are not done yet.

For all who care, Tango appears to compile with D1.027.

(It didn't compile with D1.026 -- some errors about "scope".
I tested with the SVN version of Tango with DMD.
I did not try the 0.99.4 "Frank" release, or GCD so I can't vouch for those.)

--bb

Walter Bright wrote:
> A whole lotta library improvements.

I had to copy and paste the 2.0 changelog into my editor to be able to even read it.  Would it be possible to get a readable font face and size? There is no shame in just using black text on a white background either. Please?

I use FF 2 on winxp, so I don't think I have a weird setup.  19 inch CRT, 1152x864. That's pretty mainstream, and the 1.0 docs look just fine on my screen.

torhu wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> A whole lotta library improvements.
> 
> I had to copy and paste the 2.0 changelog into my editor to be able to even read it.  Would it be possible to get a readable font face and size? There is no shame in just using black text on a white background either. Please?
> 
> I use FF 2 on winxp, so I don't think I have a weird setup.  19 inch CRT, 1152x864. That's pretty mainstream, and the 1.0 docs look just fine on my screen.

The font is pretty darned small over here too.  Also WinXP/FF2.  I wouldn't say unreadable, but the 1.0 changelog is definitely easier on the eyes.

I thought a web developer was helping you to make the D site more modern.  Is this the result of that?  Or is that yet to come?

--bb

Saaa wrote:
> Is it possible to check how many known bugs are still unsolved for D1 ? 

I think you can get that from bugzilla.

Bill Baxter wrote:
> The font is pretty darned small over here too.  Also WinXP/FF2.  I wouldn't say unreadable, but the 1.0 changelog is definitely easier on the eyes.

That's good feedback. You can try tweaking the style.css, and let me know what makes it look better.

> I thought a web developer was helping you to make the D site more modern.  Is this the result of that?  Or is that yet to come?

That kinda fizzled out.

Walter Bright wrote:
> A whole lotta library improvements.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.027.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.011.zip
> 
> I had planned on doing struct destructors for this update, but they are not done yet.

Thanks!
What happened to my fixes to std.math? They are still in phobos candidate, but not in the trunk.

Walter Bright wrote:

> A whole lotta library improvements.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.027.zip
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.011.zip
> 
> I had planned on doing struct destructors for this update, but they are not done yet.

Thanks!

If anybody cares about Konqueror, phobos 2 docs layout is broken in Konqueror 3 and 4. I suspect this is because of the possibly redundant </div> tag right above <div id="content">.

Max Samukha wrote:
> If anybody cares about Konqueror, phobos 2 docs layout is broken in
> Konqueror 3 and 4. I suspect this is because of the possibly redundant
> </div> tag right above <div id="content">.

Try it now.

Walter Bright wrote:

> Max Samukha wrote:
>> If anybody cares about Konqueror, phobos 2 docs layout is broken in Konqueror 3 and 4. I suspect this is because of the possibly redundant </div> tag right above <div id="content">.
> 
> Try it now.

Fixed.