Thread overview |
---|
March 25, 2008 So is this an error in the Tango Book ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Page 76 Binary Operators -I never really understood them. AND opAnd o&c opAnd_r OR opOr o&c opOr_r The examples o&c are identical ? |
March 26, 2008 Re: So is this an error in the Tango Book ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ty Tower | Ty Tower wrote: > Page 76 Binary Operators -I never really understood them. > > AND opAnd o&c opAnd_r > OR opOr o&c opOr_r > > The examples o&c are identical ? It's a typo in the book. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation |
March 26, 2008 Re: So is this an error in the Tango Book ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to torhu | torhu Wrote:
> Ty Tower wrote:
> > Page 76 Binary Operators -I never really understood them.
> >
> > AND opAnd o&c opAnd_r
> > OR opOr o&c opOr_r
> >
> > The examples o&c are identical ?
>
> It's a typo in the book.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation
GDay Torhu Yes thanks . I studied it in uni about 17 years ago but still don't follow its use . Seemed as though that would be wrong but had to go tongue in cheek . Crossed it again in digital counter construction with 4017 chips etc Cheers
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation