Hello,

I'd like to get the fully qualified name of a class for some CTFE:

`MyClass.classinfo.name`

returns the expected result, but is not evaluated at compiletime.

I already thought about demangle(MyClass.mangleof) but this seems to be bad coding style and I also didn't find a demangle-function in Tango yet.

best regards
Matthias Walter

"Matthias Walter" <walter@mail.math.uni-magdeburg.de> wrote in message news:ftn3gh$urd$1@digitalmars.com...
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to get the fully qualified name of a class for some CTFE:
>
> `MyClass.classinfo.name`
>
> returns the expected result, but is not evaluated at compiletime.
>
> I already thought about demangle(MyClass.mangleof) but this seems to be bad coding style and I also didn't find a demangle-function in Tango yet.

Sadly that's about the best you can do.  See:

http://www.dsource.org/projects/ddl/browser/trunk/meta/demangle.d

For an implementation that will demangle stuff at compile-time and allow you to get FQNs.

Matthias Walter wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to get the fully qualified name of a class for some CTFE:
> 
> `MyClass.classinfo.name`
> 
> returns the expected result, but is not evaluated at compiletime.
> 
> I already thought about demangle(MyClass.mangleof) but this seems 
> to be bad coding style and I also didn't find a demangle-function
> in Tango yet.
> 
> best regards
> Matthias Walter

take a look at ".stringof", I /think/ it can be used for this.

BCS Wrote:

> Matthias Walter wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'd like to get the fully qualified name of a class for some CTFE:
> > 
> > `MyClass.classinfo.name`
> > 
> > returns the expected result, but is not evaluated at compiletime.
> > 
> > I already thought about demangle(MyClass.mangleof) but this seems
>  > to be bad coding style and I also didn't find a demangle-function
>  > in Tango yet.
> > 
> > best regards
> > Matthias Walter
> 
> take a look at ".stringof", I /think/ it can be used for this.

".stringof" doesn't return the fully qualified name.

Leonard Dahlmann wrote:
> BCS Wrote:
> 
>>take a look at ".stringof", I /think/ it can be used for this.
> 
> 
> ".stringof" doesn't return the fully qualified name.

Well than I think i was wrong. Crud.