May 02, 2008 [OT] Curlies and try/catch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I figured some people here might know. Honestly, this has always been a question of mine... Why do most (all but D?) languages force you to use curlies for try/catch? Is it because they are enforcing style? Encouraging you to not use them for simple one-offs? I really like how D works. I wish all languages were like it in this (and many other) respect(s). -[Unknown] |
May 02, 2008 Re: [OT] Curlies and try/catch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Unknown W. Brackets | "Unknown W. Brackets" <unknown@simplemachines.org> wrote in message news:fvfq25$2br9$1@digitalmars.com... >I figured some people here might know. Honestly, this has always been a question of mine... > > Why do most (all but D?) languages force you to use curlies for try/catch? Is it because they are enforcing style? Encouraging you to not use them for simple one-offs? I don't know. It's especially irritating in languages (*COUGH*JAVA*COUGH*) that really like you to use exceptions for things that should arguably be return values (*COUGH*THREAD.SLEEP()*COUGH*). I've adopted the D-style curly omission in my language. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation