http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2175

           Summary: wrong categorizing of dstress test case
           Product: D
           Version: 1.030
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: dstress
        AssignedTo: thomas-dloop@kuehne.cn
        ReportedBy: davidl@126.com


trunk/run/c/case_01.d shouldn't be categorized as runnable any more


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2175


kamm-removethis@incasoftware.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from kamm-removethis@incasoftware.de  2008-09-09 10:29 -------
The comment in the file states:

// this clearly seems illegal but I can't find any rule combination disallowing it

And indeed, the D spec seems not to forbid nested functions inside switch blocks to contain a case statement; in fact, the spec is not very specific about case statements in general (see the scope issues...).

However, in this case it seems clear enough that it should be illegal. I've moved it to nocompile in dsource-dstress 1599.


--