Thread overview
DIP 1047, "Add @gc as a Function Attribute" -- Formal Assessment Begins
Aug 19
ryuukk_
August 17

I've merged and assigned DIP 1047. As of today, it's in Formal Assessment. I've asked Walter and Atila to render a verdict within the next two weeks, which is our goal under the new DIP process.

You can find the DIP here:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1047.md

It went through one round of review in the Development forum:

https://forum.dlang.org/post/ojjsplombwzzjhjymrnw@forum.dlang.org

When I hear the decision, I'll announce it in a separate thread.

Thanks to Quirin for taking the time to put the DIP together.

August 19

On Saturday, 17 August 2024 at 10:56:37 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

>

I've merged and assigned DIP 1047. As of today, it's in Formal Assessment. I've asked Walter and Atila to render a verdict within the next two weeks, which is our goal under the new DIP process.

You can find the DIP here:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1047.md

It went through one round of review in the Development forum:

https://forum.dlang.org/post/ojjsplombwzzjhjymrnw@forum.dlang.org

When I hear the decision, I'll announce it in a separate thread.

Thanks to Quirin for taking the time to put the DIP together.

Why was this the priority over Tagged Union, Tuple or Pattern Matching, Module Scope Operator?

Sometimes i feel like you pick the random thing only just to not talk about the rest

August 19

On Monday, 19 August 2024 at 06:03:08 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:

>

Sometimes i feel like you pick the random thing only just to not talk about the rest

I didn't pick it. Quirin told me he was ready for assessment, so I moved it forward. Rikki's "Callback for Matching Type" DIP is next because, again, he told me he was ready. The new DIP process is driven by the DIP authors, not me or anyone else.