http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2375

           Summary: Error using invariant array initializers with indexed
                    elements
           Product: D
           Version: 2.019
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: samukha@voliacable.com


May be duplicate of http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1253

Marking it critical as the only workaround I've found is dupping the array, which is not acceptable.

enum int[] a = [1 : 1];

void main()
{
    auto e = a[0];
}
----
Error: array initializers as expressions are not allowed (x4)


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2375


samukha@voliacable.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical




-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2375





------- Comment #1 from terranium@yandex.ru  2008-09-30 04:04 -------
workaround

invariant int[2] a = [1:1];


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2375





------- Comment #2 from samukha@voliacable.com  2008-10-01 07:34 -------
works, thanks


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2375


bugzilla@digitalmars.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #3 from bugzilla@digitalmars.com  2008-10-02 04:14 -------
The error message is correct, and so is the workaround. Not a bug, though the array initializer syntax should be improved.


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2375





------- Comment #4 from terranium@yandex.ru  2008-10-02 09:59 -------
I've turned bug 1253 into tracker of struct/array initializers syntax issues. Or should we open a tracker explicitly?


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2375





------- Comment #5 from samukha@voliacable.com  2008-10-03 03:14 -------
> Not a bug, though the
> array initializer syntax should be improved.

May I ask what's wrong with the syntax?

Also, since I can't remember when the compiler has been issuing duplicate error messages, which is a big stress factor :)


--