http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2461

           Summary: Duplicate typedef (with different initializer) in module
                    has wrong value
           Product: D
           Version: 2.020
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla@digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: rosscanning2007@gmail.com


The code below produces the output
555
555

when it should be
555
666


import std.stdio;

void f1() {
   typedef int MyInt = 555;
   MyInt x;
   writefln(x);
}

void f2() {
   typedef int MyInt = 666;
   MyInt x;
   writefln(x);
}

void main() {
   f1();
   f2();
}


-- 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2461


smjg@iname.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |smjg@iname.com
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code




------- Comment #1 from smjg@iname.com  2008-11-19 18:10 -------
Please remember to assign keywords to bug reports.  To everybody reading this: Please look through issues you've reported and check for missing keywords.


-- 

Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention?  I agree they're useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone.

> ------- Comment #1 from smjg@iname.com  2008-11-19 18:10 -------
> Please remember to assign keywords to bug reports.  To everybody reading this: Please look through issues you've reported and check for missing keywords.

Later,
Brad

"Brad Roberts" wrote
> Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention?  I agree they're useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone.

The problem with them (IMO) is that you have to type them in exactly as they are defined.

Every time I add a keyword (and I do use them, not sure if it helps anything), I have to click on the keywords link to see how they are spelled and what they mean.  It would be a MUCH better interface (and probably more used feature) if the keywords were a checkbox list instead.  I understand that this is not your software, but bugzilla's, so probably no change will come from this.  But at least it's an idea for explaining why it's a seldom used feature.

My preference for interface would be a checkbox list, with tooltips explaining the keywords when you hover over them.

-Steve

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> "Brad Roberts" wrote
>> Does anyone, particularly Walter, pay any attention?  I agree they're useful categorizers, but I have doubts that they're even used by anyone.
> 
> The problem with them (IMO) is that you have to type them in exactly as they are defined.
> 
> Every time I add a keyword (and I do use them, not sure if it helps anything), I have to click on the keywords link to see how they are spelled and what they mean.  It would be a MUCH better interface (and probably more used feature) if the keywords were a checkbox list instead.  I understand that this is not your software, but bugzilla's, so probably no change will come from this.  But at least it's an idea for explaining why it's a seldom used feature.
> 
> My preference for interface would be a checkbox list, with tooltips explaining the keywords when you hover over them.
> 
> -Steve
> 

Sorry, I want to distinguish 'enter' from 'use'.  It's obvious that some people enter them.  Have you ever searched for bugs with specific key words, or used it for any analysis of existing bugs in any way?

Later,
Brad

"Brad Roberts" <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote in message news:mailman.25.1227201018.22690.digitalmars-d-bugs@puremagic.com...
<snip>
> Sorry, I want to distinguish 'enter' from 'use'.  It's obvious that some
> people enter them.  Have you ever searched for bugs with specific key
> words, or used it for any analysis of existing bugs in any way?

Yes.

Being able to tell how many bugs of which of these kinds are around is both interesting and potentially useful.

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail address is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everybody may benefit. 

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2461


Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2012-12-01 16:46:46 PST ---
Can't recreate in 2.060 with -d.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------