March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don | "Don" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:gop88f$2b97$1@digitalmars.com... > Haruki Shigemori wrote: >> Don ????????: >>> On Windows, it compiles, but I can't get it to link. The errors are all related to malloc-family functions. > > As far as I know, that's the first time I've ever ???????? something. > From the tiny bit I've managed to remember, I think it's more like the first time Don-?? had ????? something ;) (What's the root form of that verb in ramaji again? "kikiru" or something like that? I think it starts with a "k", IIRC (My apologies if "kikiru" is something bad)) >> You got link errors because you over-wrote to old folders. > Thanks! This one line was all I needed. |
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nick Sabalausky | "Nick Sabalausky" <a@a.a> wrote in message news:gop8op$2cfj$1@digitalmars.com... > "Don" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:gop88f$2b97$1@digitalmars.com... >> Haruki Shigemori wrote: >>> Don ????????: >>>> On Windows, it compiles, but I can't get it to link. The errors are all related to malloc-family functions. >> >> As far as I know, that's the first time I've ever ???????? something. >> > > From the tiny bit I've managed to remember, I think it's more like the first time Don-?? had ????? something ;) (What's the root form of that verb in ramaji again? "kikiru" or something like that? I think it starts with a "k", IIRC (My apologies if "kikiru" is something bad)) > >>> You got link errors because you over-wrote to old folders. >> Thanks! This one line was all I needed. > > Oops, I guess my newsgroup client can't send UTF. ;) |
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to dsimcha | dsimcha wrote:
> Purely out of curiosity, with regard to the DMD source, what changed that all of
> the sudden caused you to release the full source?
I've been intending to for a while, it took a while for me to clean it up, check all the licenses, and get it into a presentable form.
Essentially, it's pretty obvious that the world has changed, and closed source is no longer acceptable for a mainstream product that people will be relying on. Open source is the future, and it's past time for dmd to join the party!
|
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jarrett Billingsley | Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> From the backend license:
>
> "The Software was not designed to operate after December 31, 1999."
>
> Well that explains EVERYTHING! ;)
Yeah, well, I'm not at liberty to change that license.
|
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Georg Wrede | Georg Wrede wrote:
> Should the following file be removed?
>
> samples/d/dhry.res
>
> I see no point with it, and it is over 200k.
I don't know why that's there, I'll get rid of it.
|
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Tomas Lindquist Olsen | Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> Compiling on linux from source is broken! Looks like you forgot to
> include the total.h file!
You don't need it, I'll fix the makefile. total.h is for precompiled headers, which don't even exist on gcc.
|
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don | Don wrote:
> On Windows, it compiles, but I can't get it to link. The errors are all related to malloc-family functions.
It could be you're picking up the wrong mem.h. Try installing the source tree into a clean directory.
|
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | I can confirm that this indeed fixes the issues with the infinite loop in compilation for me. And it does so without creating any blahblah__initZ errors too. This is the first compiler since 1.037 that can actually compile my source.
Not sure about the speed though. I haven't measured the compile time, but it did feel like it took significantly longer to compile than 1.037 did. I'll measure it when I get the chance to see if there's really a difference or not.
--bb
2009/3/5 Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com>:
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.041.zip
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.026.zip
>
|
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don | On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Don <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> Haruki Shigemori wrote:
>>
>> Don さんは書きました:
>>>
>>> On Windows, it compiles, but I can't get it to link. The errors are all related to malloc-family functions.
>
> As far as I know, that's the first time I've ever さんは書きました something.
It says "Don-san wa kakimashita:" or "Mr. Don wrote:"
:-)
|
March 05, 2009 Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Great release! :) Although I'm curious, where is the 3x speed improvement from? Just general misc optimizations, or something specific? |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation