Thread overview
constant expression
Feb 23, 2016
Nicholas Wilson
Feb 23, 2016
Ali Çehreli
Feb 23, 2016
Nicholas Wilson
Feb 23, 2016
Ali Çehreli
Feb 23, 2016
Nicholas Wilson
Feb 24, 2016
Marc Schütz
February 23, 2016
How is this not a constant expression ?
auto ctodtypes =
[
    "void"      : "void",
    "uint32_t"  : "uint",
    "uint64_t"  : "ulong",
    "int32_t"   : "int",
    "int64_t"   : "long",
    "char"      : "char",
    "uint8_t"   : "ubyte",
    "size_t"    : "size_t",
    "float"     : "float"
];
dmd complains
source/emit/registryemitter.d(7): Error: non-constant expression ["void":"void", "uint32_t":"uint", "uint64_t":"ulong", "int32_t":"int", "int64_t":"long", "char":"char", "uint8_t":"ubyte", "size_t":"size_t", "float":"float"]
February 22, 2016
On 02/22/2016 09:52 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> How is this not a constant expression ?
> auto ctodtypes =
> [
>      "void"      : "void",
>      "uint32_t"  : "uint",
>      "uint64_t"  : "ulong",
>      "int32_t"   : "int",
>      "int64_t"   : "long",
>      "char"      : "char",
>      "uint8_t"   : "ubyte",
>      "size_t"    : "size_t",
>      "float"     : "float"
> ];
> dmd complains
> source/emit/registryemitter.d(7): Error: non-constant expression
> ["void":"void", "uint32_t":"uint", "uint64_t":"ulong", "int32_t":"int",
> "int64_t":"long", "char":"char", "uint8_t":"ubyte", "size_t":"size_t",
> "float":"float"]

Because it's mutable: :)

    ctodtypes["hello"] = "world";

What context are you using it in?

Ali

February 23, 2016
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 07:26:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 09:52 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>> How is this not a constant expression ?
>> auto ctodtypes =
>> [
>>      "void"      : "void",
>>      "uint32_t"  : "uint",
>>      "uint64_t"  : "ulong",
>>      "int32_t"   : "int",
>>      "int64_t"   : "long",
>>      "char"      : "char",
>>      "uint8_t"   : "ubyte",
>>      "size_t"    : "size_t",
>>      "float"     : "float"
>> ];
>> dmd complains
>> source/emit/registryemitter.d(7): Error: non-constant expression
>> ["void":"void", "uint32_t":"uint", "uint64_t":"ulong", "int32_t":"int",
>> "int64_t":"long", "char":"char", "uint8_t":"ubyte", "size_t":"size_t",
>> "float":"float"]
>
> Because it's mutable: :)
>
>     ctodtypes["hello"] = "world";
>
> What context are you using it in?
>
> Ali

I've tried with both mutable and immutable a module scope. Scope I want is global (don't care about mutability)

February 22, 2016
On 02/22/2016 11:38 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:

> I've tried with both mutable and immutable a module scope. Scope I want
> is global (don't care about mutability)
>

Uncomment immutable if you want immutable and remove 'shared' if you want multiple of this per thread (probably not).

/* immutable */ string[string] ctodtypes;

shared static this() {
    ctodtypes =
    [
        "void"      : "void",
        "uint32_t"  : "uint",
        "uint64_t"  : "ulong",
        "int32_t"   : "int",
        "int64_t"   : "long",
        "char"      : "char",
        "uint8_t"   : "ubyte",
        "size_t"    : "size_t",
        "float"     : "float"
     ];
}

void main() {
    ctodtypes["hello"] = "world";
}

Ali

February 23, 2016
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 07:43:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 11:38 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>
>> I've tried with both mutable and immutable a module scope. Scope I want
>> is global (don't care about mutability)
>>
>
> Uncomment immutable if you want immutable and remove 'shared' if you want multiple of this per thread (probably not).
>
> /* immutable */ string[string] ctodtypes;
>
> shared static this() {
>     ctodtypes =
>     [
>         "void"      : "void",
>         "uint32_t"  : "uint",
>         "uint64_t"  : "ulong",
>         "int32_t"   : "int",
>         "int64_t"   : "long",
>         "char"      : "char",
>         "uint8_t"   : "ubyte",
>         "size_t"    : "size_t",
>         "float"     : "float"
>      ];
> }
>
> void main() {
>     ctodtypes["hello"] = "world";
> }
>
> Ali

Thanks

Silly question. Why is this necessary?
February 23, 2016
On 2/23/16 3:00 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 07:43:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 02/22/2016 11:38 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> I've tried with both mutable and immutable a module scope. Scope I want
>>> is global (don't care about mutability)
>>>
>>
>> Uncomment immutable if you want immutable and remove 'shared' if you
>> want multiple of this per thread (probably not).
>>
>> /* immutable */ string[string] ctodtypes;
>>
>> shared static this() {
>>     ctodtypes =
>>     [
>>         "void"      : "void",
>>         "uint32_t"  : "uint",
>>         "uint64_t"  : "ulong",
>>         "int32_t"   : "int",
>>         "int64_t"   : "long",
>>         "char"      : "char",
>>         "uint8_t"   : "ubyte",
>>         "size_t"    : "size_t",
>>         "float"     : "float"
>>      ];
>> }
>>
>> void main() {
>>     ctodtypes["hello"] = "world";
>> }
>>
>> Ali
>
> Thanks
>
> Silly question. Why is this necessary?

D cannot create associative arrays at compile time that can be used during runtime. You have to create them at runtime.

It could probably do effectively what is done above, however. Just nobody has made that enhancement.

-Steve
February 24, 2016
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 08:00:24 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> Silly question. Why is this necessary?

Due to a problem with the implementation, associative arrays currently can't be initialized statically. We hope it will eventually get fixed, but until then, you have to use module constructors as a workaround.