| Thread overview | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 18, 2017 newCTFE Status November 2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi Guys,
I know there has been a lack of visible activity lately in the field of newCTFE.
But fear not, there is progress; even if it is much slower then before.
I just implemented support for varadic function templates.
(which produces a curious AST in which you have more arguments then parameters ;))
luckily this was easily fixed because dmd provides a way to iterate over the expanded parameter tuple. The elusively named (Parameter.getNth) function.
which looks like this:
/***************************************
* Get nth Parameter, folding in tuples.
* Returns:
* Parameter* nth Parameter
* NULL not found, *pn gets incremented by the number
* of Parameters
*/
static Parameter getNth(Parameters* parameters, size_t nth, size_t* pn = null)
{
Parameter param;
int getNthParamDg(size_t n, Parameter p)
{
if (n == nth)
{
param = p;
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
int res = _foreach(parameters, &getNthParamDg);
return res ? param : null;
}
Notice how pn is never actually touched!
and therefore will not get incremented.
| ||||
November 19, 2017 Re: newCTFE Status November 2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stefan Koch | On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 13:54:45 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I know there has been a lack of visible activity lately in the field of newCTFE.
>
> But fear not, there is progress; even if it is much slower then before.
Great. Is there a checklist for what's left before newCTFE is ready for formal review?
| |||
November 19, 2017 Re: newCTFE Status November 2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nordlöw | On Sunday, 19 November 2017 at 17:03:32 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
> On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 13:54:45 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I know there has been a lack of visible activity lately in the field of newCTFE.
>>
>> But fear not, there is progress; even if it is much slower then before.
>
> Great. Is there a checklist for what's left before newCTFE is ready for formal review?
I guess that would be union and delegate support at the very least.
Also the newCTFE-ABI needs to be documented.
| |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply