On 2009-10-13 01:56:11 +0200, Moritz Warning <moritzwarning@web.de> said:

> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:29:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> 
>> "Moritz Warning" <moritzwarning@web.de> wrote in message
>> news:hb01mo$23g5$1@digitalmars.com...
>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:53:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> 
>>>> "Moritz Warning" <moritzwarning@web.de> wrote in message
>>>> news:havc43$9av$1@digitalmars.com...
>>>>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>>> 
>>> [..]
>>>> If you're using tango trunk,
>>>> then I don't know what the problem is either...
>>> 
>>> It's trunk.
>> 
>> Maybe this?:
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/forums/topic/809
> 
> No, this is the first error:
> 
> /home/mwarning/trunk/build/runtime/../../runtime/common/tango/core/
> Thread.d(659): Error: e2ir: cannot cast from tango.core.Thread.Thread to
> void*
> /home/mwarning/trunk/build/runtime/../../runtime/common/tango/core/
> Thread.d(659): Error: e2ir: cannot cast from tango.core.Thread.Thread to
> void*
> 
> Though, these cases work:
> 
> class Foo{}
> Foo foo = new Foo();
> auto x = cast(void*) foo;
> 
> A{ void* x(){ return cast(void*)this; } }

yet that is a strange error, I was not really able to reduce it, on one side it is clearly a compiler error
(it does not allow cast(void*)this which is valid), on the other all smaller cases that I could think of seem to work...

submitted it as
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

Fawzi

> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html

The link within "Download latest D 2.0 alpha  D compiler for Win32 and x86 linux" is still pointing to 2.027.

Ali

Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve
> 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170
> 
> see my comments there for more details.

I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you try it out with QtD?

Walter Bright, el 13 de octubre a las 14:16 me escribiste:
> Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve
> >
> >http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170
> >
> >see my comments there for more details.
> 
> I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you try it out with QtD?

Thanks for the small commits :)

BTW, unless you're planning to skip DMD 2.035, I think you increased the DMD 2 version accidentally to 2.036 ;)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                      http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I'm a great quitter. It's one of the few things I do well. I come from a
long line of quitters. My father was a quitter, my grandfather was a quitter...
I was raised to give up.
	-- George Constanza

Walter Bright Wrote:

> Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve
> > 
> > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170
> > 
> > see my comments there for more details.
> 
> I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you try it out with QtD?

I commented on this in the bugzilla on #1170, that I tested QtD with dmd rev 205 yesterday, and it compiles fine.

Thank you for separate commits!