October 31, 2009 [Issue 3459] New: There should be a flavor of file.listdir() that returns a range instead of taking a delegate | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 Summary: There should be a flavor of file.listdir() that returns a range instead of taking a delegate Product: D Version: 2.035 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: llucax@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Leandro Lucarella <llucax@gmail.com> 2009-10-30 21:21:07 PDT --- This idiom: ---- foreach (f; listdir(some_dir)) writeln(f); ---- is much more simpler, convenient and clearer than: ---- listdir(some_dir, (string f) { writeln(f) }); ---- Which looks more obscure (specially when the callback is more complex. The first idiom was not possible in D1 without allocating an array for the elements, which can be inefficient, but with ranges in place in D2, I think listdir() should use them. Thanks. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 31, 2009 [Issue 3459] There should be a flavor of file.listdir() that returns a range instead of taking a delegate | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Leandro Lucarella | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 Leandro Lucarella <llucax@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Leandro Lucarella <llucax@gmail.com> 2009-10-30 21:35:15 PDT --- OMG! listdir is a opApply candidate, so foreach can be used already with it... Damn! I should go to bed... -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation