On 04/05/10 17:31, Walter Bright wrote:
> If they're unrelated, I think we should just go ahead and release what we have now.

I agree :) The fact gdb isn't bursting into flames and giving error messages means it's unrelated, so let's make the release :)

On May 4, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Robert Clipsham wrote:
>> On 04/05/10 03:12, Jason House wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, it still isn't usable
>>
>> These issues are unrelated to the ones that have been fixed, you should report new bugs for them. The issues that have been fixed are the "DWARF DIE at <addr> in <addr>" etc.
>>
>
> If they're unrelated, I think we should just go ahead and release what we have now.

Fine by me. I'll cross my fingers that other gdb compatibility issues will get resolved.

Jason House wrote:
>
> Fine by me. I'll cross my fingers that other gdb compatibility issues will get resolved.
>

The idea is that the current release at least should not be making things worse!