Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 04, 2013 Starting Formal Review of std.process | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
The changes for std.process are under review at: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gclsbrghhjitnfderoos@forum.dlang.org std.process is improvements to the existing std.process and is a complete change to the API. The original API remains but these will be going through deprecation. The major change is support for redirecting stdin/stdout/stderr As review has been going for a month, I'm proposing we do a formal review for 1 week followed by a 1 week vote. |
April 09, 2013 Re: Starting Formal Review of std.process | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jesse Phillips | On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:31:43 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> The changes for std.process are under review at:
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gclsbrghhjitnfderoos@forum.dlang.org
>
> std.process is improvements to the existing std.process and is a
> complete change to the API. The original API remains but these
> will be going through deprecation.
>
> The major change is support for redirecting stdin/stdout/stderr
>
> As review has been going for a month, I'm proposing we do a formal review for 1 week followed by a 1 week vote.
As there has been no objection, Thursday PST will be the last Review day. Voting will start Friday/Thursday night.
|
April 11, 2013 Re: Starting Formal Review of std.process | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jesse Phillips Attachments:
| Hi Jesse, Is there any example code that uses it? On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Jesse Phillips <Jessekphillips+D@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:31:43 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: > >> The changes for std.process are under review at: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/**gclsbrghhjitnfderoos@forum.**dlang.org<http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gclsbrghhjitnfderoos@forum.dlang.org> >> >> std.process is improvements to the existing std.process and is a complete change to the API. The original API remains but these will be going through deprecation. >> >> The major change is support for redirecting stdin/stdout/stderr >> >> As review has been going for a month, I'm proposing we do a formal review for 1 week followed by a 1 week vote. >> > > As there has been no objection, Thursday PST will be the last Review day. Voting will start Friday/Thursday night. > |
April 11, 2013 Re: Starting Formal Review of std.process | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rory McGuire | On Thursday, 11 April 2013 at 08:27:24 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Is there any example code that uses it? The docs provide examples http://www.kyllingen.net/code/std-process2/phobos-prerelease/std_process.html is there something insufficient about them? |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation