Thread overview
[Bug 60] GDC support - X32, X86, X86_64
Jun 08, 2013
Iain Buclaw
Jun 08, 2013
Iain Buclaw
Jun 13, 2013
Iain Buclaw
Jun 13, 2013
David Nadlinger
Jun 13, 2013
Iain Buclaw
June 08, 2013
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60

--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> 2013-06-08 17:15:40 UTC ---
Updated results

gdc -m64
---
passed: 10706
failed: 0
unresolved: 0


gdc -m32
---
passed: 10702
failed: 4
unresolved: 0

Failing files:
runnable/test42.d


gdc -mx32
---
passed: 10706
failed: 0
unresolved: 0

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
June 08, 2013
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
June 13, 2013
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60

--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> 2013-06-13 17:07:00 UTC ---
Now fully passing  (prior to 2.063 merge).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
June 13, 2013
On Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 17:07:14 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Now fully passing  (prior to 2.063 merge).

Just curious: Does this include druntime, Phobos, exception chaining, …?

David
June 13, 2013
On 13 June 2013 18:11, David Nadlinger <code@klickverbot.at> wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 17:07:14 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Now fully passing  (prior to 2.063 merge).
>
>
> Just curious: Does this include druntime, Phobos, exception chaining, …?
>
> David

No, they are commented out with BUG comments. :o)

--
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';