Looks like Phoronix posted an article about D moving into GCC a couple weeks ago. So hopefully things are going well on this.


http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODc2Ng

Jesse Phillips schrieb:
> Looks like Phoronix posted an article about D moving into GCC a couple weeks ago. So hopefully things are going well on this.
> 
> 
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODc2Ng

Phoronix took notice of D?
Expect monthly articles revealing "performance drawbacks" in the latest beta versions of dmd/gdc/ldc that only matter in artificial benchmarks.

Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips+D@gmail.com> wrote in news:ice6jc$cdo$1@digitalmars.com:

> Looks like Phoronix posted an article about D moving into GCC a couple weeks ago. So hopefully things are going well on this.
> 
> 
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODc2Ng

The headline is misleading.  The article talks about GDC moving into the GCC family (which would be a good thing).  The headline appears to suggest the whole D project is looking to mergewith GCC (which would be a bad thing).

JMRyan Wrote:

> Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips+D@gmail.com> wrote in news:ice6jc$cdo$1@digitalmars.com:
> 
> > Looks like Phoronix posted an article about D moving into GCC a couple weeks ago. So hopefully things are going well on this.
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODc2Ng
> 
> The headline is misleading.  The article talks about GDC moving into the GCC family (which would be a good thing).  The headline appears to suggest the whole D project is looking to mergewith GCC (which would be a bad thing).

Considering D is a language, I would hope all of it was merged into GCC. Otherwise I assume by "D project" you mean DMD, which is an incorrect association.