Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 27, 2011 [Issue 5496] New: 64bit: possible ABI issue in C runtime header. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496 Summary: 64bit: possible ABI issue in C runtime header. Product: D Version: D1 & D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: druntime AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: ibuclaw@ubuntu.com --- Comment #0 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2011-01-27 03:30:00 PST --- Created an attachment (id=885) patch mars.h for D2 Should be using ptrdiff_t rather than int struct Interface. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 27, 2011 [Issue 5496] 64bit: possible ABI issue in C runtime header. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2011-01-27 03:33:51 PST --- Created an attachment (id=886) patch object.d and mars.h for D1 Backport patch for D1 too. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 28, 2011 [Issue 5496] 64bit: possible ABI issue in mars.h for D runtime. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2011-01-28 04:54:50 PST --- Edited summary for clarity sake. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
February 07, 2011 [Issue 5496] 64bit: possible ABI issue in mars.h for D runtime. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496 --- Comment #3 from Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> 2011-02-06 16:27:40 PST --- Do we really need to worry about supporting objects with vtables > 32bit? I don't think so. Or is the d frontend already offset with a size_t offset and this fixes the runtime to properly deal with this? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
February 07, 2011 [Issue 5496] 64bit: possible ABI issue in mars.h for D runtime. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2011-02-06 18:04:26 PST --- I agree with Brad. There's no way this will be larger than 32 bits. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation