Thread overview | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 18, 2011 dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Now with 64 bit Linux support! (Though expect problems with it, it's brand new.) http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.067.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.052.zip |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:18:55 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> Now with 64 bit Linux support! (Though expect problems with it, it's
> brand new.)
>
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.067.zip
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.052.zip
64-bit compiler, new date/time module AND a bunch of bug fixes -- is it christmas already? :)
Fantastic work, guys!
-Lars
|
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | 64 bit Linux support, std.date is gone, alternative linker... ...so what are you guys doing for the end of the world? |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright Attachments:
| On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 02:18 -0800, Walter Bright wrote: > Now with 64 bit Linux support! (Though expect problems with it, it's brand new.) Damn, now I have to go and fix the SCons D tool (which currently forces 32-bit on any platform) instead of just being able to grumble about lack of 64-bit support! Great stuff. Thanks. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.067.zip > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.052.zip -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Russel Winder Attachments: | On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:25:39 +0000 Russel Winder <russel@russel.org.uk> wrote: > Damn, now I have to go and fix the SCons D tool (which currently forces 32-bit on any platform) instead of just being able to grumble about lack of 64-bit support! What about waf/cmake? Are they ready for 64bit D? Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: CDBF17CA |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Had to roll back to 2.051, hit this: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 Bug with SDC. If you're _really_ short of test cases, you can mine through SDC's 12000 odd lines of code. *g* https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter: > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.052.zip 2.052 32-bit version seems to work. Online I don't see the info about the new xorshift: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_random.html And I suggest to add to that std_random page a note that explains when and why use xorshift instead of the other rnd generators. Bye, bearophile |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Gour Attachments:
| On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 12:30 +0100, Gour wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:25:39 +0000 > Russel Winder <russel@russel.org.uk> wrote: > > > Damn, now I have to go and fix the SCons D tool (which currently forces 32-bit on any platform) instead of just being able to grumble about lack of 64-bit support! > > What about waf/cmake? Are they ready for 64bit D? I have not used Waf for a D project, just for C++ and LaTeX ones, so I am not sure the state of play there. Someone, definitely not me (*), will have to contact Thomas Nagy to ask who to contact to get D tool development. I try and avoid using CMake, so have no idea what the state of play there is. (*) Thomas has banned me from the Waf Google group so I am not able to monitor or contribute to the Waf eco-system. Which is irritating as I really quite like Waf. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Russel Winder Attachments: | On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:15:48 +0000 Russel Winder <russel@russel.org.uk> wrote: > I have not used Waf for a D project, just for C++ and LaTeX ones, so I am not sure the state of play there. Do you use SCons for D projects? > Someone, definitely not me (*), will have to contact Thomas Nagy to ask who to contact to get D tool development. Being busy with other things I put my waf-list subscription into web-only mode. > I try and avoid using CMake, so have no idea what the state of play there is. OK. > (*) Thomas has banned me from the Waf Google group so I am not able to monitor or contribute to the Waf eco-system. Which is irritating as I really quite like Waf. Really? What happened? I've noticed, when suggesting some improvements to Waf , via IRC, that he tend to be (sometimes) a little bit non-flexible, but banning... :-( Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: CDBF17CA |
February 18, 2011 Re: dmd 1.067 and 2.052 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | On 2/18/11 6:10 AM, bearophile wrote:
> Walter:
>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.052.zip
>
> 2.052 32-bit version seems to work.
>
> Online I don't see the info about the new xorshift:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_random.html
>
> And I suggest to add to that std_random page a note that explains when and why use xorshift instead of the other rnd generators.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
Also there are a bunch of bugs I fixed but didn't have the time to put in the changelog. Will "hot patch" the changelog when I get a chance.
Andrei
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation