http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4028


Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clugdbug@yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #8 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-04-06 07:10:00 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Is it possible/good to encode the simple constant default arguments (ints, strings, etc) in the type/signature of the delegate, and refuse the other types of default arguments?

What good would adding that corner case be?
I think it's just a bizarre and silly feature. It's a horrendously complicated
and confusing way of doing one special case of currying.
If you really need this ability (which I doubt), you can achieve the same thing
via a struct with two opCall overloads.

Just kill it.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4028



--- Comment #9 from yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> 2011-06-08 07:30:13 PDT ---
*** Issue 4664 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4028


yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |yebblies@gmail.com
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


--- Comment #10 from yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> 2011-07-03 22:22:51 EST ---
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3646 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------