Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 19, 2010 [Issue 4680] New: Duplicated function/overload error message | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4680 Summary: Duplicated function/overload error message Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2010-08-19 06:57:39 PDT --- This is a wrong D2 program: int x = 1; int x = 1; void main() {} dmd 2.048 prints a good enough error message: test.d(2): Error: variable test.x conflicts with variable test.x at test.d(1) This is another wrong D2 program: void foo() {} void foo() {} void main() {} But here dmd 2.048 on Windows shows a link error: OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.2 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2009 All rights reserved. http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/optlink.html test.obj(test) Offset 00151H Record Type 00C3 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : _D4test3fooFZv In my opinion here it's better for dmd to spot the function foo() duplication and give a cleaner error message, something like: test.d(2): Error: function test.foo() has the same signature as the function test.foo() at test.d(1) This bug may happen if a function is duplicated, or if the overloading is done in a wrong way. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 14, 2010 [Issue 4680] Duplicated function/overload error message | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4680 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2010-10-14 14:19:01 PDT --- This shows a related problem: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.learn&article_id=22302 > And a note: had forgotten to add an empty main(), just for compiling: the linker produced a rather big amount of error text without any hint to the actual issue. Maybe dmd could cope with that before calling gcc? I agree, it's better if DMD gives a nice and clean error message when the main() is missing. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 10, 2011 [Issue 4680] Duplicated function/overload error message | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4680 yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |yebblies@gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> 2011-06-10 09:15:19 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1003 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation