July 18, 2010 [Issue 4482] New: Missing warnings when not compiling with -w | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4482 Summary: Missing warnings when not compiling with -w Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: jmdavisProg@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmail.com> 2010-07-18 00:54:36 PDT --- If I have series of statements such as throw new Exception("it broke"); writeln("unreachable"); and compile with -w, then naturally, this won't compile because the second statement is unreachable. That's good. However, if you do not compile with -w, no warning is printed. Shouldn't all warnings be printed regardless and -w simply choose to treat them as errors? As it is, if you're foolish enough not to compile with -w, you can easily miss stuff that's obviously wrong. I can understand the user choosing not to treat a warning as an error, but I would expect it to still be reported, and it's not. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 15, 2011 [Issue 4482] Missing warnings when not compiling with -w | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jonathan M Davis | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4482 yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |yebblies@gmail.com Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> 2011-06-15 00:47:19 PDT --- This is not how it's defined to work in D. Warnings will only be printed if using the -w or -wi compiler switches. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation