Jesse Phillips Wrote:

> I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.

Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3

On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Jesse Phillips Wrote:
>
>> I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.
>
> Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3

!? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:22:39 +0200, simendsjo wrote:

> On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> Jesse Phillips Wrote:
>>
>>> I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.
>>
>> Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3
> 
> !? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.

The author is maintaining it. But there was a good time while it didn't compile with the latest and so a published fix was made.

As to whether there was an attempted patch submission, I don't know. But I'm going with github because it is damn easy to contribute, and publicize work sooner than a review process allows.

It would be interesting if Christopher forked his project and continued working from github (its not like he doesn't get the credit).

On 27.07.2011 03:30, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:22:39 +0200, simendsjo wrote:
>
>> On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>>> Jesse Phillips Wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But
>>>> Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.
>>>
>>> Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3
>>
>> !? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo
>> seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.
>
> The author is maintaining it. But there was a good time while it didn't
> compile with the latest and so a published fix was made.
>
> As to whether there was an attempted patch submission, I don't know. But
> I'm going with github because it is damn easy to contribute, and
> publicize work sooner than a review process allows.
>
> It would be interesting if Christopher forked his project and continued
> working from github (its not like he doesn't get the credit).

I agree github is a much better collaboration platform than dsource+svn, but C.Miller should at least be contacted. It's bad for a project to get fragmented if it doesn't have to be.

Off to try the github version then.

On 27.07.2011 09:47, simendsjo wrote:
> On 27.07.2011 03:30, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:22:39 +0200, simendsjo wrote:
>>
>>> On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>>>> Jesse Phillips Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But
>>>>> Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3
>>>
>>> !? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo
>>> seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.
>>
>> The author is maintaining it. But there was a good time while it didn't
>> compile with the latest and so a published fix was made.
>>
>> As to whether there was an attempted patch submission, I don't know. But
>> I'm going with github because it is damn easy to contribute, and
>> publicize work sooner than a review process allows.
>>
>> It would be interesting if Christopher forked his project and continued
>> working from github (its not like he doesn't get the credit).
>
> I agree github is a much better collaboration platform than dsource+svn,
> but C.Miller should at least be contacted. It's bad for a project to get
> fragmented if it doesn't have to be.
>
> Off to try the github version then.
>

Worked great, thanks!
And yes, github is better. I removed the warnings and added a pull request. Go github.

simendsjo Wrote:

> I agree github is a much better collaboration platform than dsource+svn, but C.Miller should at least be contacted. It's bad for a project to get fragmented if it doesn't have to be.
> 
> Off to try the github version then.
> 

I'm pretty sure I contacted him to find out what to do with my ini updates, but never heard from him, but I used his contact form and so don't have a record of it or know if it went through.