Thread overview | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 06, 2011 [Issue 5936] New: DMD Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 Summary: DMD Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, rejects-valid Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: kennytm@gmail.com Blocks: 340 --- Comment #0 from kennytm@gmail.com 2011-05-06 08:44:05 PDT --- Test case: --------------------------- import std.c.stdio; int a() { return V.s(0); } struct V { static pure auto s(int x) { return 55; } } void main() { printf("%d\n", a()); } --------------------------- Bus error --------------------------- The bug appears only if all of the following conditions are met: 1. The function 's' must be 'pure'. 2. The function 's' must have auto-return. 3. The function 's' must have at least one named parameter. For example, if the parameter is changed to 'pure auto s(...)' the bug disappears. 4. The function 's' must be placed after its first use. For example, moving 'struct V' above 'int a()' the bug disappears. The program works correctly in 2.048. Therefore I have marked this as a regression. ============================ If instead of calling the function, we just compute the pointer of 's', we'll get a forward reference error instead: --------------------------- void a() { cast(void)(&V.s); } struct V { static pure auto s(int x) { return 0; } } --------------------------- x.d(2): Error: forward reference to s --------------------------- But this error also happens on 2.048. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 06, 2011 [Issue 5936] Regression(2.050): Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kennytm@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch CC| |clugdbug@yahoo.com.au Summary|DMD Segfault when |Regression(2.050): Segfault |forward-referencing pure |when forward-referencing |auto-return member function |pure auto-return member |with parameter. |function with parameter. --- Comment #1 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-06-06 06:18:17 PDT --- The segfault is a simple null pointer dereference which can easily be patched. mtype.c, TypeFunction::parameterEscapes, line 5369 if (purity) { /* With pure functions, we need only be concerned if p escapes * via any return statement. */ - Type* tret = nextOf()->toBasetype(); - if (!isref && !tret->hasPointers()) + Type* tret = nextOf() ? nextOf()->toBasetype() : NULL; + if (!isref && tret && !tret->hasPointers()) { /* The result has no references, so p could not be escaping * that way. */ return FALSE; } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 06, 2011 [Issue 5936] Regression(2.050): Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kennytm@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 --- Comment #2 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-06-06 06:21:15 PDT --- *** Issue 5844 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 30, 2011 [Issue 5936] Regression(2.050): Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kennytm@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 --- Comment #3 from kennytm@gmail.com 2011-06-30 11:27:04 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The segfault is a simple null pointer dereference which can easily be patched. > > mtype.c, TypeFunction::parameterEscapes, line 5369 > > if (purity) > { /* With pure functions, we need only be concerned if p escapes > * via any return statement. > */ > - Type* tret = nextOf()->toBasetype(); > - if (!isref && !tret->hasPointers()) > + Type* tret = nextOf() ? nextOf()->toBasetype() : NULL; > + if (!isref && tret && !tret->hasPointers()) > { /* The result has no references, so p could not be escaping > * that way. > */ > return FALSE; > } This patch only fixes 5844. In git master this becomes Internal error: toir.c 190 with or without your patch. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 27, 2011 [Issue 5936] Regression(2.050): Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kennytm@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 --- Comment #4 from kennytm@gmail.com 2011-07-27 11:48:10 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > This patch only fixes 5844. In git master this becomes > > Internal error: toir.c 190 > > with or without your patch. As of the latest git master the ICE no longer happens and the test cases now behaves normally. Also, one more test case which involves CTFE, based on std.complex.complex: --------------------------- auto bug5936c(R)(R i) @safe pure nothrow { return true; } static assert( bug5936c(0) ); --------------------------- -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
August 24, 2011 [Issue 5936] Regression(2.050): Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kennytm@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 --- Comment #5 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-08-24 11:39:00 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/330 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
August 24, 2011 [Issue 5936] Regression(2.050): Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kennytm@gmail.com | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2011-08-24 13:40:31 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b9ee455e4e8c129b429d8e22fd4f6d15885274fb -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation