Hi,

Do anybody know if the implicit casting rules of float[] in the example below, works as intended?

E.

--

// dmd v2.054
module main;

struct MyStruct
{
	void funOpAssign(float[1u] data) { }
	void opOpAssign(string op)(float[1u] data) if(op=="<<") { }
}

int main(string[] argv)
{
	MyStruct s;
	float[1u] a = [1.0f]; // Compiles
	s.funOpAssign([1.0f]); // Compiles
	s <<= [1.0f]; // Issue: Does not compile
	s <<= cast(float[1u])[1.0f]; // Compiles

	return 0;
}

No, this is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4953

"Erik Baklund" <ebaklund@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:j3u33n$1f87$1@digitalmars.com...
> Hi,
>
> Do anybody know if the implicit casting rules of float[] in the example
> below,
> works as intended?
>
> E.
>
> --
>
> // dmd v2.054
> module main;
>
> struct MyStruct
> {
> void funOpAssign(float[1u] data) { }
> void opOpAssign(string op)(float[1u] data) if(op=="<<") { }
> }
>
> int main(string[] argv)
> {
> MyStruct s;
> float[1u] a = [1.0f]; // Compiles
> s.funOpAssign([1.0f]); // Compiles
> s <<= [1.0f]; // Issue: Does not compile
> s <<= cast(float[1u])[1.0f]; // Compiles
>
> return 0;
> }

Thanks!
Ouch, the regression is still not fixed after almost one year.
I have put a vote on it.
E.

The good news is there are two possible patches that should fix it.

"Erik Baklund" <ebaklund@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:j3v9dk$ero$1@digitalmars.com...
> Thanks!
> Ouch, the regression is still not fixed after almost one year.
> I have put a vote on it.
> E.