Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 22, 2011 64 bit version? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I just read that D fits nicely to the 64-bit architecture. Is there currently a D compiler that fully exploits the 64-bit hardware under Windows 7? I mean e.g. one can have operations in D on unsigned long int of 64 bits size that correspond directly to hardware operations so as to achieve high efficiency? (Sorry for my ignorant's question, I don't know yet the language.) Thanks in advance. M. K. Shen |
September 22, 2011 Re: 64 bit version? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to mok-kong shen | On Thursday, September 22, 2011 19:38:25 mok-kong shen wrote:
> I just read that D fits nicely to the 64-bit architecture. Is there currently a D compiler that fully exploits the 64-bit hardware under Windows 7? I mean e.g. one can have operations in D on unsigned long int of 64 bits size that correspond directly to hardware operations so as to achieve high efficiency? (Sorry for my ignorant's question, I don't know yet the language.) Thanks in advance.
It's a toolchain issue. dmc, Digital Mars' C compiler, and optlink, its linker, are 32-bit only. On Linux, gcc is used as the linker, and gcc can be 64-bit, so it was fairly straightforward to port dmd to 64-bit on Windows as far as the toolchain goes, but since on Windows, the entire rest of the toolchain is still 32-bit only, we can't have a 64-bit dmd yet. It'll happen eventually, but I believe that the main focus at this point is on bug fixing and that fixing the Windows toolchain to be 64-bit capable is a lower priority for right now.
- Jonathan M Davis
|
September 22, 2011 Re: 64 bit version? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to mok-kong shen | Currently you have to use GDC. |
September 22, 2011 Re: 64 bit version? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Trass3r Attachments:
| or ldc, I thought that could also compile d2
2011/9/22 Trass3r <un@known.com>
> Currently you have to use GDC.
>
|
September 22, 2011 Re: 64 bit version? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to maarten van damme | > or ldc, I thought that could also compile d2
LLVM still doesn't support SEH, though it's being worked on.
|
September 25, 2011 Re: 64 bit version? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Trass3r | On 22/09/2011 21:12, Trass3r wrote: >> or ldc, I thought that could also compile d2 > > LLVM still doesn't support SEH, though it's being worked on. The latest development code does for Win64. -- Robert http://octarineparrot.com/ |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation