On 1/25/22 10:56 PM, forkit wrote:
>On Wednesday, 26 January 2022 at 03:45:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>Regardless of the "correct" way to deal with this, I agree with you that printing code addresses is not helpful. I'm assuming this is Windows? Is there nothing better that can be done?
You mean stop using Windows?
No I mean, on Windows, is there no better thing to print out for a stack frame other than the address? Not a question aimed at you ;)
If I don't include debug info for Mac (even if I strip the executable), I still get function names, but not file/line info.
I'm pretty sure Windows isn't the only OS that does this by default, but I can't remember all the different OSes I've tried D on.
-Steve