On 2012-10-04 20:13, timotheecour wrote:

> I'm fine with that (and already doing this, to call Runtime.initialize),
> but that doesn't solve the issue of this thread.

No, not if you need to redefine functions.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On Thursday, 4 October 2012 at 19:20:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-10-04 20:13, timotheecour wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with that (and already doing this, to call Runtime.initialize),
>> but that doesn't solve the issue of this thread.

> No, not if you need to redefine functions.

Even if I don't need to redefine:

As I was explaining in the first post, my original problem was that calling the existing (non-templated, non-modified) extern(C) std_stdio_static_this() seems to have no effect: a call to writeln(0) will cause a runtime crash in the shared lib.

Even after a call to Runtime.initialize. So far, only adding a templated version std_stdio_static_this2()() and calling it allows writeln(0) to work.

I wish somebody had an explanation why std_stdio_static_this() doesn't work but std_stdio_static_this2()() works.

On 2012-10-04 21:30, timotheecour wrote:

> Even if I don't need to redefine:
>
> As I was explaining in the first post, my original problem was that
> calling the existing (non-templated, non-modified) extern(C)
> std_stdio_static_this() seems to have no effect: a call to writeln(0)
> will cause a runtime crash in the shared lib.

Yes, that's what how I understood it. Do you want to do both?

> Even after a call to Runtime.initialize. So far, only adding a templated
> version std_stdio_static_this2()() and calling it allows writeln(0) to
> work.
>
> I wish somebody had an explanation why std_stdio_static_this() doesn't
> work but std_stdio_static_this2()() works.

I have no idea. Do you have a small test case to show, including how you compiled it?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg