December 24, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | On Monday, 24 December 2012 at 13:05:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-12-24 13:52, Rory McGuire wrote:
>> What kind of computers would we need to do these tests?
>> I have some spare resources for one or two VPS.
>
> I have no idea how many are need to run tests on all branches. Brad would know this better.
>
> What usually is a problem is Mac OS X. Since you're only allowed to run it on Apple computers (if you want to follow the EULA) and Mac users is a minority here.
>
>> Perhaps others do too.
>
> People have already donated computers/shells to run the test suite as we do now.
>
> I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to start using Travis CI. Currently it only supports Linux but they're working on adding Mac OS X and Windows.
If people aren't fussy about the EULA (which is apparently not valid in the EU anyway) then I could probably set up os x on a machine at university that could be left on indefinitely as a test machine. I wouldn't be able to do anything on that until mid-january though.
|
December 24, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John Colvin | On 2012-12-24 22:38, John Colvin wrote: > If people aren't fussy about the EULA (which is apparently not valid in > the EU anyway) then I could probably set up os x on a machine at > university that could be left on indefinitely as a test machine. I > wouldn't be able to do anything on that until mid-january though. I think they are. It's been talked on these newsgroups before. -- /Jacob Carlborg |
December 25, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John Colvin | On 12/24/2012 1:38 PM, John Colvin wrote:
> If people aren't fussy about the EULA (which is apparently not valid in the EU
> anyway)
I'd rather we stick to the EULA, much as I don't like them.
|
December 25, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 03:09:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/24/2012 1:38 PM, John Colvin wrote:
>> If people aren't fussy about the EULA (which is apparently not valid in the EU
>> anyway)
>
> I'd rather we stick to the EULA, much as I don't like them.
Ok, I guess it's worth not pissing off Apple.
If only we had some small commercial support of some sort... A mac mini is less than £500 new here in the UK, probably less than that in the US and that's not even considering second-hand...
|
December 25, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John Colvin | On 12/25/2012 5:27 AM, John Colvin wrote:
> If only we had some small commercial support of some sort... A mac mini is less
> than £500 new here in the UK, probably less than that in the US and that's not
> even considering second-hand...
An old, slow, second hand one would be fine, as long as it can run the latest OS X.
|
December 25, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Tue, 25 Dec 2012, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/25/2012 5:27 AM, John Colvin wrote:
> > If only we had some small commercial support of some sort... A mac mini is
> > less
> > than ?500 new here in the UK, probably less than that in the US and that's
> > not
> > even considering second-hand...
>
> An old, slow, second hand one would be fine, as long as it can run the latest OS X.
Thats how we have osx in the pull tester. I picked up a used mini. I've accumulated quite a lot of oldish hardwareat this point. The only other doner machine is Sean's osx box. More hardware would be nice, but isnt a blocker for additional branch testing, software is. Working on it over the holidays.
|
December 26, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | On 2012-12-25 20:53, Brad Roberts wrote: > More hardware would be nice, but isnt a > blocker for additional branch testing, software is. Working on it over > the holidays. Have you considered using any existing software for continues integration server? We're using CruiseControl (the Ruby version) at work. It's simple and easy to setup and does what we need it to do. -- /Jacob Carlborg |
December 26, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | Anyone knows when the new version will be available for download? An E.T.A. would be fine. Thanks! Phil |
December 26, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Phil Lavoie | On 12/26/2012 2:08 PM, Phil Lavoie wrote: > Anyone knows when the new version will be available for download? An E.T.A. > would be fine. It is now. Please subscribe to the dmd-beta mailing list, where such notifications go. http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip |
December 26, 2012 Re: Getting ready for 2.061 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 22:10:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/26/2012 2:08 PM, Phil Lavoie wrote:
>> Anyone knows when the new version will be available for download? An E.T.A.
>> would be fine.
>
> It is now. Please subscribe to the dmd-beta mailing list, where such notifications go.
>
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Thanks!
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation