Newly discovered changes in C++11 on using const and mutable for thread safety

http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/C-and-Beyond-2012-Herb-Sutter-You-dont-know-blank-and-blank

03-Jan-2013 12:39, Michal Minich пишет:
> Newly discovered changes in C++11 on using const and mutable for thread
> safety
>
> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/C-and-Beyond-2012-Herb-Sutter-You-dont-know-blank-and-blank
>

So now const is retrofitted as thread-safe. Again by convention.
And that is true only because of a statement in std library expectations. This shift is great but just ... by convention.

Looks like this channel got some updates on C++ and beyond 2012. I've found this one to be far more revealing:

http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/C-and-Beyond-2012-Andrei-Alexandrescu-Systematic-Error-Handling-in-C



-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

On 1/4/2013 6:00 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> 03-Jan-2013 12:39, Michal Minich пишет:
>> Newly discovered changes in C++11 on using const and mutable for thread
>> safety
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/C-and-Beyond-2012-Herb-Sutter-You-dont-know-blank-and-blank
>>
>>
>
> So now const is retrofitted as thread-safe. Again by convention.
> And that is true only because of a statement in std library expectations. This
> shift is great but just ... by convention.
>
> Looks like this channel got some updates on C++ and beyond 2012. I've found this
> one to be far more revealing:
>
> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/C-and-Beyond-2012-Andrei-Alexandrescu-Systematic-Error-Handling-in-C

Channel 9 has some great videos. I wish the good ones had transcripts.

On Friday, 4 January 2013 at 19:03:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 1/4/2013 6:00 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>> 03-Jan-2013 12:39, Michal Minich пишет:
>>> Newly discovered changes in C++11 on using const and mutable for thread
>>> safety
>>>
>>> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/C-and-Beyond-2012-Herb-Sutter-You-dont-know-blank-and-blank
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So now const is retrofitted as thread-safe. Again by convention.
>> And that is true only because of a statement in std library expectations. This
>> shift is great but just ... by convention.
>>
>> Looks like this channel got some updates on C++ and beyond 2012. I've found this
>> one to be far more revealing:
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/C-and-Beyond-2012-Andrei-Alexandrescu-Systematic-Error-Handling-in-C
>
> Channel 9 has some great videos. I wish the good ones had transcripts.

Usually they are better to watch then whatever might be showing on TV, but only on alone evenings. :)