http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648



--- Comment #10 from github-bugzilla@puremagic.com 2013-01-14 12:33:10 PST ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/00bc154aa5bbe3bbad72906edbfa6ab8caf0fc6a fix Issue 648 - DDoc: unable to document mixin statement

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648


Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |bugzilla@digitalmars.com
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


--- Comment #11 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2013-01-14 13:44:12 PST ---
The string mixin issue isn't fixed, but that is issue 2420.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648


Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


--- Comment #12 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-01-14 13:47:36 PST ---
It's not fixed.

The revert should have been done in full because of the uncaught bug, instead you created your own fixup of my pull and now master is failing: http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/

You should revert everything and allow me to work on the fix again.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648



--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2013-01-14 14:09:56 PST ---
reverted.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648


Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |doob@me.com


--- Comment #14 from Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> 2013-01-14 23:27:29 PST ---
I think this would be useful to have. For example:

/// doc
class Foo
{
    /// doc
    mixin Singleton;
}

In this case you might want that the singleton should be documented and part of the public API. It would be a good idea to know that Foo is a singleton.

Another example:

/// doc
class Bar
{
    /// doc
    mixin Property!(int, "x");
}

The mixin would expand to something like:

private int x_;
@property int x () { return x_; }
@property int x (int value) { return x_ = value; }

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=648



--- Comment #15 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-01-20 10:56:05 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1485

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------