Thread overview
[Issue 6419] New: [CTFE] Cannot create a struct if it has a constructor (may cause ICE)
Jul 31, 2011
kennytm@gmail.com
[Issue 6419] [CTFE] Cannot create a nested struct if it has a constructor (may cause ICE)
Aug 12, 2011
Don
Aug 12, 2011
Don
[Issue 6419] [CTFE] Cannot create a nested struct if it has a constructor
Aug 23, 2011
Don
Sep 29, 2011
Don
[Issue 6419] [CTFE] Cannot create a non-static nested struct
Dec 29, 2011
Don
Jul 02, 2012
ponce
Feb 08, 2013
Andrej Mitrovic
July 31, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419

           Summary: [CTFE] Cannot create a struct if it has a constructor
                    (may cause ICE)
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Mac OS X
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: kennytm@gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from kennytm@gmail.com 2011-07-31 15:54:28 PDT ---
Test case 1:
----------------------
static assert({
    struct Result {
        this(int x) {}
    }
    auto x = Result(1);  // <-- line 5
    return true;
}());
----------------------
x.d(5): Error: CTFE internal error assigning struct
x.d(7): Error: cannot evaluate delegate @system bool()
{
struct Result
{
    this(int x)
{
return this;
}
    void* this;
}
Result x = x = 0 , x.this(1);
return true;
}
() at compile time
...
----------------------





Test case 2 (causes ICE):

----------------------
static assert(({
    struct Result {
        this(int x) {}
    }
    return Result(1);
}(), true));
----------------------
x.d(6): Error: CTFE internal error assigning struct
Bus error: 10
----------------------


This bug affects using std.algorithm.map in CTFE, although I don't see any point keeping that constructor any more.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
August 12, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419


Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dmitry.olsh@gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-08-11 23:39:26 PDT ---
*** Issue 6460 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
August 12, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419


Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clugdbug@yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #2 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-08-11 23:43:40 PDT ---
This is because if the struct is nested, TypeStruct::defaultInitLiteral()
doesn't return a literal!

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
August 23, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419


Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|ice-on-valid-code           |
            Summary|[CTFE] Cannot create a      |[CTFE] Cannot create a
                   |nested struct if it has a   |nested struct if it has a
                   |constructor (may cause ICE) |constructor


--- Comment #3 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-08-23 13:31:26 PDT ---
The bug which caused an ICE was independent to this one, and has been fixed.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
September 29, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419


Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bearophile_hugs@eml.cc


--- Comment #4 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-09-29 01:21:18 PDT ---
*** Issue 6653 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
December 29, 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419


Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[CTFE] Cannot create a      |[CTFE] Cannot create a
                   |nested struct if it has a   |non-static nested struct
                   |constructor                 |
         OS/Version|Mac OS X                    |All


--- Comment #5 from Don <clugdbug@yahoo.com.au> 2011-12-29 02:50:58 PST ---
Actually, it doesn't need a constructor. The presence of _any_ member function triggers the bug:

static assert({
    struct Result {
        void foo(){}
    }
    Result x;
    return true;
}());

If it doesn't have any member functions, then it is actually a static nested struct. So true nested structs are never supported in CTFE.

It's because the hidden member of the struct needs a pointer to the enclosing function, and this is not implemented.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
July 02, 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419


ponce <aliloko@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aliloko@gmail.com


--- Comment #6 from ponce <aliloko@gmail.com> 2012-07-02 12:32:26 PDT ---
This is sad because you can't do compile-time FizzBuzz :)

-------------------
import std.stdio, std.conv, std.range, std.algorithm;

void main()
{
    enum fizzbuzz = iota(1, 100)
        .map!(x =>
            (0 == x % 15) ? "FizzBuzz" :
            (0 == x % 5) ? "Buzz" :
            (0 == x % 3) ? "Fizz" : to!string(x))
        .joiner("\n");
    writeln(fizzbuzz);
}
-------------------

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
February 08, 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6419


Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


--- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-02-08 15:17:48 PST ---
All the test-case provided here work in 2.061.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------